I really hope that people aren't attempting something like this without a set of "real" maps with them. Because if the $hit really hits the fan from a orientationon standpoint the *fundamental* item you'd better have is a map, a compass, and the knowledge to use it. Like I said in another thread - the CT is ridiculously well marked... but even I wouldn't go on it without a *full* set of "real" maps.climbing_rob wrote: Well sorry if I sounded smug, I was in a hurry and didn't "speak" well; my point is (and I'm sure you know this) on thru hikes, many of us prefer not to pre-plan too much and just go with the flow. Maps are great, but a full set would be heavier than a single little 1.9 ounce book, would it not? In any case, not to sound smug again, but "little blue lines on a map" do not always signify useable water, the dotted lines for trail sometimes completely miss tons of switchbacks and such and are harder to estimate miles, and most importantly to me on these hikes is that good campsites are typically not at all obvious on TOPO maps.
Heh. I've been told this before... I'm skeptical, but I'll go with it.Again, sorry to sound smug, but this ain't 1994 anymore either, ya know? (more smugness)
That said - there are some rules that will *never* change when going out in the wilderness, IMO - and having a map and compass is one of 'em.