LCW Peaks
Forum rules
- This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
- Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
- Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
- Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
- Hungry Jack
- Posts: 914
- Joined: 7/18/2008
- 14ers: 12
- 13ers: 4
- Trip Reports (1)
Re: LCW Peaks
So here is a question: What can I expect to find in terms of surface water in the LCW? I imagine Lost Creek has plenty. Will there be water up in McCurdy Park? (I would expect so). How about in the basin west of Bison Peak?
please rotate your device
-
- Posts: 444
- Joined: 2/17/2014
- Trip Reports (0)
Re: LCW Peaks
I've been wanting to try hiking in the LCW but am somewhat nervous to because I typically hike alone and stick to well-established trails (no bush-whacking for me) and I have the impression that the LCW might not fit the bill. Does anyone have any recommended hikes in LCW that involve no offtrail route-finding? Perhaps Bison/McCurdy Peaks?
- climbing_rob
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: 5/24/2010
- 14ers: 58
- 13ers: 121
- Trip Reports (0)
Re: LCW Peaks
Don't know about McCurdy park, but Indian Creek, west of bison has flowing water. all the creeks we saw last weekend were flowing well.Hungry Jack wrote:So here is a question: What can I expect to find in terms of surface water in the LCW? I imagine Lost Creek has plenty. Will there be water up in McCurdy Park? (I would expect so). How about in the basin west of Bison Peak?
- Hungry Jack
- Posts: 914
- Joined: 7/18/2008
- 14ers: 12
- 13ers: 4
- Trip Reports (1)
Re: LCW Peaks
It's been a wet 15 months or so, at least in the Front Range.climbing_rob wrote:Don't know about McCurdy park, but Indian Creek, west of bison has flowing water. all the creeks we saw last weekend were flowing well.Hungry Jack wrote:So here is a question: What can I expect to find in terms of surface water in the LCW? I imagine Lost Creek has plenty. Will there be water up in McCurdy Park? (I would expect so). How about in the basin west of Bison Peak?
please rotate your device
- Jim Davies
- Posts: 7639
- Joined: 6/8/2006
- 14ers: 58 1
- 13ers: 67
- Trip Reports (5)
Re: LCW Peaks
The trails are very good, well-built and well-marked, but don't go to any of the mountaintops. Both Bison and McCurdy summits are reachable by leaving a trail above timberline and walking across tundra for maybe half a mile, followed by climbing a rockpile.rdp32 wrote:I've been wanting to try hiking in the LCW but am somewhat nervous to because I typically hike alone and stick to well-established trails (no bush-whacking for me) and I have the impression that the LCW might not fit the bill. Does anyone have any recommended hikes in LCW that involve no offtrail route-finding? Perhaps Bison/McCurdy Peaks?
If you just want a good dayhike, the Goose Creek trail to the Shafthouse is easy to moderate difficulty, easy to follow, and gets you a good selection of the uniqueness of the area. http://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/psicc/re ... 4&actid=50" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The National Geographic/Trails Illustrated "Tarryall" map covers the area well. The Roach Lost Creek book concentrates on summits, but is useful if you want to get a feel for the layout of the area.
Climbing at altitude is like hitting your head against a brick wall — it's great when you stop. -- Chris Darwin
I'm pretty tired. I think I'll go home now. -- Forrest Gump
I'm pretty tired. I think I'll go home now. -- Forrest Gump
-
- Posts: 444
- Joined: 2/17/2014
- Trip Reports (0)
Re: LCW Peaks
Well, that description for Bison/McCurdy doesn't sound too bad. I'll have to pick up a map for the area and hit one of those in a month or two
- awake
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 4/19/2010
- 14ers: 20
- 13ers: 51
- Trip Reports (3)
Re: LCW Peaks
Bison was a very well established trail. Relatively easy hike, and really incredible views. I'd definitely recommend it.rdp32 wrote:Well, that description for Bison/McCurdy doesn't sound too bad. I'll have to pick up a map for the area and hit one of those in a month or two
- MyFeetHurt
- Posts: 201
- Joined: 7/8/2007
- 14ers: 58
- Trip Reports (1)
Re: LCW Peaks
This question seems to come up a lot, now that I have been there a few times I can say with certainty that there is water in McCurdy park. There is a nice sized running creek on the north end, plus a giant swamp in the middle. I also saw a running creek in Lake Park as well. I wouldnt worry about water in those areas.Hungry Jack wrote:So here is a question: What can I expect to find in terms of surface water in the LCW? I imagine Lost Creek has plenty. Will there be water up in McCurdy Park? (I would expect so). How about in the basin west of Bison Peak?
- climbing_rob
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: 5/24/2010
- 14ers: 58
- 13ers: 121
- Trip Reports (0)
Re: LCW Peaks
There are not trails to the very summit of either Bison or McCurdy, but within about a half mile. the key, I think already mentioned, is Roach's book that covers the routes well. If you climb McCurdy, let us know if you find the right summit the first time! (lots of folks don't...).rdp32 wrote:Well, that description for Bison/McCurdy doesn't sound too bad. I'll have to pick up a map for the area and hit one of those in a month or two
- Jim Davies
- Posts: 7639
- Joined: 6/8/2006
- 14ers: 58 1
- 13ers: 67
- Trip Reports (5)
Re: LCW Peaks
I've been up there twice, and I'm still not sure I've been to the real summit. Next time I'm bringing my hand level.
Climbing at altitude is like hitting your head against a brick wall — it's great when you stop. -- Chris Darwin
I'm pretty tired. I think I'll go home now. -- Forrest Gump
I'm pretty tired. I think I'll go home now. -- Forrest Gump
- climbing_rob
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: 5/24/2010
- 14ers: 58
- 13ers: 121
- Trip Reports (0)
Re: LCW Peaks
For a long time there was a stick-cairn right on top. The summit to the east look taller until you climb it and look over to the true summit.Jim Davies wrote:I've been up there twice, and I'm still not sure I've been to the real summit. Next time I'm bringing my hand level.
Another confusing one is Lake Park peak.... I swear to doG that the summit w/o the register (to the NE) is taller, but never have been sure. Just climb both and it doesn't matter!
- Jim Davies
- Posts: 7639
- Joined: 6/8/2006
- 14ers: 58 1
- 13ers: 67
- Trip Reports (5)
Re: LCW Peaks
OK, I remember the stick. Whew. I actually went all the way over to the east-side rockpiles first (maybe a quarter mile away?), but thought one of the west ones looked higher. I guess I was right!
Climbing at altitude is like hitting your head against a brick wall — it's great when you stop. -- Chris Darwin
I'm pretty tired. I think I'll go home now. -- Forrest Gump
I'm pretty tired. I think I'll go home now. -- Forrest Gump