night sky pictures
- mattpayne11
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: 09 May 2009, 23:23
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: night sky pictures
jameseroni wrote:Just getting into this.... is it true that it's hard on the sensor in the camera if the exposure is greater than 5 minutes? Is a special filter required for longer exposure times?
First I've heard of that.
- Theodore
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 21:43
- Location: Olathe, KS
Re: night sky pictures
I wouldn't be surprised if it was hard on the old film SLR's, but I would bet that with 'modern' cameras, it's a non-issue.
- Steve Gio
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 29 May 2009, 09:38
Re: night sky pictures
I have heard about sensors getting overloaded during long exposures. I must have read it on a photography forum but don't recall where. I would be curious to know for sure. I would think with a full format camera there should be no problem.
- vonmackle
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: 04 Jul 2005, 16:18
- Location: Westminster
Re: night sky pictures
jameseroni wrote:Just getting into this.... is it true that it's hard on the sensor in the camera if the exposure is greater than 5 minutes? Is a special filter required for longer exposure times?
I think the issue with long exposures in low light photography tends to be excessive noise. I'm guessing that's why people stack several shorter exposures to create star trails.
Leaving the sensor exposed for extended periods in daylight can overheat the sensor and cause image degradation. I have experienced this when shooting in live view for too long.
I don't use any filters at night...my good lens only opens up to f4, so I need all the light I can get.
"You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." -Mark Twain
- mattpayne11
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: 09 May 2009, 23:23
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: night sky pictures
Yep, although sensor noise does not mean that the sensor is damaged, just that it is "hot."
I would not be concerned unless your long exposure is shooting at the sun...
I would not be concerned unless your long exposure is shooting at the sun...
- mattpayne11
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: 09 May 2009, 23:23
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: night sky pictures
Thought I'd post my most recent nightscape - a 360 pano of the Milky Way and a cabin near Grand Mesa, Colorado.

Milky Way and the Grand Mesa cabin by Matt-Payne, on Flickr

Milky Way and the Grand Mesa cabin by Matt-Payne, on Flickr
- shaberer0511
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 29 Jul 2010, 17:53
Re: night sky pictures
Fantastic pictures. Matt Payne, yours are truly incredible. I am starting to take night sky pictures and I was just wondering what kind of settings/shutter speeds you use. I have taken a few but all I can see is the big dipper. Any pointers? I will try to post my picture.
Last edited by shaberer0511 on 21 Aug 2012, 23:32, edited 1 time in total.
- mattpayne11
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: 09 May 2009, 23:23
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: night sky pictures
shaberer0511 wrote:Fantastic pictures. Matt Payne, yours are truly incredible. I am starting to take night sky pictures and I was just wondering what kind of settings/shutter speeds you use. I have taken a few but all I can see is the big dipper. Any pointers? I will try to post my picture.
Thanks.
You need a tripod for starters.
You also need a decent camera and lens. The lower the f stop the better (on the lens). I use a f/2.8 lens for most my night shots... with 30 second exposures... ISO 800-3200.
- shaberer0511
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 29 Jul 2010, 17:53
Re: night sky pictures
Thanks! I will give that a shot. I have a Sony DSLR camera with two lenses ranging from 18-200 mm.
- letourneau41
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: 14 May 2009, 22:27
- Location: Denver, CO
Re: night sky pictures
Would a lense with an fstop of 4 be low enough to get a decent shot? Or should I try to get to the 2.8 range.
Every man Dies, but not every man truly lives.
- mattpayne11
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: 09 May 2009, 23:23
- Location: Colorado Springs
Re: night sky pictures
letourneau41 wrote:Would a lense with an fstop of 4 be low enough to get a decent shot? Or should I try to get to the 2.8 range.
You can do that, but ideally f 2.8
This has some great info that should get you started to help you think in terms of f and shutter speed and ISO (the exposure triangle).
http://theamusing.com/photography/startrails.html/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests








