Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
ChrisG
Posts: 39
Joined: 10/10/2011
Trip Reports (0)
 
Contact:

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by ChrisG »

d_baker wrote:
ChrisG wrote: Too bad the San Juans have only one pano raken (Half Peak).
This pano is pretty cool. Make sure you scroll to the side.

Bill, do we need to start a gas fund for you? ;)
Good idea. I'll donate!
Colorado has what...500 - 600 13ers & 62 have been pano'd so far? Let's get 'er done! [-o<

BTW...thank you, d! All I can say is WOW.....
"Is there any need to offer proof that this odious perversion of the law [socialism] is a perpetual source of hatred and discord; that it tends to destroy society itself? If such proof is needed, look at the United States [in 1850]. There is no country in the world where the law is kept more within its proper domain: the protection of every person's liberty and property. As a consequence of this, there appears to be no country in the world where the social order rests on a firmer foundation."

- - Frederich Bastiat, 1850, http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html
User avatar
geojed
Posts: 932
Joined: 6/30/2009
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 138 13
Trip Reports (29)
 

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by geojed »

ChrisG wrote:I'm not sure what the climbing difficulty rating for Gladstone Peak is (a minimum of 4, possibly? No routes for Gladstone have been added to its 13ers page), but it sure looks like a cool spot for a 360 pano!

Too bad the San Juans have only one pano raken (Half Peak). Does difficulty have anything to do with it?
I have several good panoramas for the San Juans in this TR. One from Wilson Peak, Gladstone, El Diente, and Mt Wilson. http://14ers.com/php14ers/tripreport.php?trip=14273" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In this TR for Vermilion there are some more good panos too. http://14ers.com/php14ers/tripreport.php?trip=14276" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
• It's by getting away from life that we can see it most clearly... It's by depriving ourselves of the myriad of everyday experiences that we renew our appreciation for them...I've learned from my experiences in the mountains that I love life. — Dave Johnston
• Mountains are not climbed merely to reach a geographical location — but as personal and spiritual challenges to the participants. — David Stein
User avatar
ChrisG
Posts: 39
Joined: 10/10/2011
Trip Reports (0)
 
Contact:

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by ChrisG »

geojed wrote:
ChrisG wrote:I'm not sure what the climbing difficulty rating for Gladstone Peak is (a minimum of 4, possibly? No routes for Gladstone have been added to its 13ers page), but it sure looks like a cool spot for a 360 pano!

Too bad the San Juans have only one pano raken (Half Peak). Does difficulty have anything to do with it?
I have several good panoramas for the San Juans in this TR. One from Wilson Peak, Gladstone, El Diente, and Mt Wilson. http://14ers.com/php14ers/tripreport.php?trip=14273" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

In this TR for Vermilion there are some more good panos too. http://14ers.com/php14ers/tripreport.php?trip=14276" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
WOAH...that's some fantastic photography, geo.

Bill, please forgive me for changing the subject, but I'm curious about the five 14er summits that don't have the 300' of prominence to be a ranked peak: Why are separate 14er summits such as South Elbert or "South Wilson" (14,110') not included in that list?
"Is there any need to offer proof that this odious perversion of the law [socialism] is a perpetual source of hatred and discord; that it tends to destroy society itself? If such proof is needed, look at the United States [in 1850]. There is no country in the world where the law is kept more within its proper domain: the protection of every person's liberty and property. As a consequence of this, there appears to be no country in the world where the social order rests on a firmer foundation."

- - Frederich Bastiat, 1850, http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html
User avatar
geojed
Posts: 932
Joined: 6/30/2009
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 138 13
Trip Reports (29)
 

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by geojed »

Why are separate 14er summits such as South Elbert or "South Wilson" (14,110') not included in that list?
From the peaks list page it has this note:
Peaks shown in gray do not have enough prominence to be ranked and peaks with quotes are not officially named by the USGS.
So El Diente, Cameron, North Maroon, Etc. don't have the 300' prominence but are named and generally considered to be separate peaks/summits worthy of climbing. "North Wilson", Massive Green" "East La Plata" dont have the prominence and aren't officially named.

Some of it is just tradition too since these are named peaks/summits recognized by the USGS and/or the CMC. So people feel the need/obligation to climb them and/or have them on their peak list. It's just personal preference really.

This topic has been hashed over MANY times on this forum. In the end it's kind of silly, just climb what you want and have fun doing it. That's most important!
• It's by getting away from life that we can see it most clearly... It's by depriving ourselves of the myriad of everyday experiences that we renew our appreciation for them...I've learned from my experiences in the mountains that I love life. — Dave Johnston
• Mountains are not climbed merely to reach a geographical location — but as personal and spiritual challenges to the participants. — David Stein
User avatar
BillMiddlebrook
Site Administrator
Posts: 6919
Joined: 7/25/2004
14ers: 58  46  19 
13ers: 172 44 37
Trip Reports (2)
 
Contact:

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by BillMiddlebrook »

d_baker wrote:Bill, do we need to start a gas fund for you? ;)
:lol: I just need to spend less money on elk hunting!
"When I go out, I become more alive. I just love skiing. The gravitational pull. When you ski steep terrain... you can almost get a feeling of flying." -Doug Coombs
d_baker
Posts: 3101
Joined: 11/18/2007
14ers: 58  15 
13ers: 348 11
Trip Reports (59)
 

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by d_baker »

BillMiddlebrook wrote:
d_baker wrote:Bill, do we need to start a gas fund for you? ;)
:lol: I just need to spend less money on elk hunting!
But do you have meat in the freezer?
jared_j
Posts: 15
Joined: 7/22/2013
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by jared_j »

Hey everyone, here's a first class ticket to the resurrection (of this thread).

Different question - what about the ridge connecting Gladstone Peak to Wilson Peak? If I wanted to hit both in a day, this appears an aesthetic way to do it, rather than dropping into the basin. Does it go as a scramble? I don't see reports on it, presumably because folks interested in a ridgeline traverse are on the Wilson-El Diente next door.
User avatar
Rainier_Wolfcastle
Posts: 240
Joined: 8/3/2006
14ers: 58  12 
13ers: 260 10
Trip Reports (11)
 

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by Rainier_Wolfcastle »

jared_j wrote:Different question - what about the ridge connecting Gladstone Peak to Wilson Peak? If I wanted to hit both in a day, this appears an aesthetic way to do it, rather than dropping into the basin. Does it go as a scramble? I don't see reports on it, presumably because folks interested in a ridgeline traverse are on the Wilson-El Diente next door.
That ridge is the "standard" route for Gladstone...albeit it is not a walk in the park. I don't know if it is possible to stay on the ridge all the way up Wilson Peak, but the std route is close...a little to the right then crosses over to be a little on the left.
Shawn
User avatar
Jon Frohlich
Posts: 2611
Joined: 10/14/2005
14ers: 58 
13ers: 162 3
Trip Reports (29)
 

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by Jon Frohlich »

jared_j wrote:
Different question - what about the ridge connecting Gladstone Peak to Wilson Peak? If I wanted to hit both in a day, this appears an aesthetic way to do it, rather than dropping into the basin. Does it go as a scramble? I don't see reports on it, presumably because folks interested in a ridgeline traverse are on the Wilson-El Diente next door.
There are a number of trip reports on Gladstone for the north ridge between Gladstone and Wilson Peak. The normal way to do Gladstone is to take that ridge to the summit. It goes at Class 3/4 and is very loose. The only marginally safe way is to stay very near the top of the ridge. Be wary of wobbling blocks and loose rock everywhere. Some people take one of the gullies from the basin up to the ridge but you can also take the trail up to about 13,000 on the Wilson Peak route and then do the entire ridge.

http://www.14ers.com/php14ers/tripreport.php?trip=13803

I wouldn't say it was the most fun climb I ever did and that's an understatement.
Last edited by Jon Frohlich on Thu May 08, 2014 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
andrewhamilton
Posts: 506
Joined: 9/19/2011
14ers: 58  2  58 
13ers: 95
Trip Reports (3)
 
Contact:

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by andrewhamilton »

If you are just looking to try out a cool looking ridge, then it could be a lot of fun. It does look pretty gnarly though! I doubt too many people have done it.

However, if your main objective is to climb Mt. Wilson and Gladstone in the same day in an efficient manner, then the "normal"? way of traversing from Mt. Wilson to Gladstone really is not that bad, and you don't drop too much further down than the lowpoint in the ridge between Mt. Wilson and Gladstone anyway. I'd be surprised if it was more than a few hundred feet. You certainly do not have to drop all the way back down into the basin.
User avatar
geojed
Posts: 932
Joined: 6/30/2009
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 138 13
Trip Reports (29)
 

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by geojed »

See my TR, I did this traverse from WP to GP and would've gone for MW and ElD too if thunderstorms hadn't been moving in.

http://14ers.com/php14ers/tripreport.php?trip=14273" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The way to find these TR's is to search for Gladstone Peak TR's and see if WP is listed as one of the peaks climbed too.
• It's by getting away from life that we can see it most clearly... It's by depriving ourselves of the myriad of everyday experiences that we renew our appreciation for them...I've learned from my experiences in the mountains that I love life. — Dave Johnston
• Mountains are not climbed merely to reach a geographical location — but as personal and spiritual challenges to the participants. — David Stein
User avatar
andrewhamilton
Posts: 506
Joined: 9/19/2011
14ers: 58  2  58 
13ers: 95
Trip Reports (3)
 
Contact:

Re: Traverse: Gladstone Peak to Mt. Wilson?

Post by andrewhamilton »

Oops sorry, I see I was responding to Mt. Wilson to Gladstone, not Wilson Peak to Gladstone.
Post Reply