Page 2 of 2

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 9:59 pm
by Wish I lived in CO
Ptglhs wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2020 5:11 pm
RobLowe wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:31 am Ptg... Sundog is a fun alternative. There is no sign preventing one from going down Sunshine and then down the gully between Sunshine and Sundog.
The sign in question is between sunshine and Red Cloud. You are correct there is no signage, and not much of a trail, between sunshine and sundog.
Yeh, below is a visual of the closed area, different than the alternate route.

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 10:06 pm
by Wish I lived in CO
That gulley on the Sunshine alternate route was flat out the worst gulley I've ever done. Bross, Lindsey std., Pyramid ampitheatre, Sneffels, even Columbia don't really hold a candle to just how bad this gulley is. Most dangerous spot I've been on for a 14er route. Steep and loose. Enjoyable route other than that, and loops are always fun. But just know what you're getting into.

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:22 am
by glenmiz
Sundog's a nice little peak with a great name!

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2020 9:53 am
by LetsGoMets
Looped 13832 and 13811 with RC and Sunshine a couple years ago and descended the gully for a big loop, agreed it's a bit sketchy. I thought the overall route was a good alternative and experience than repeating down the standard however and would recommend it if you're comfortable with that type of terrain.

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2020 11:49 am
by quinnwolf
I just did this last week. I (arbitrarily) decided to do RC first then SS. The standard route to SS is typical standard class 2 trail where you won't have any problems. After reaching SS, I descended west off SS on a faint, but easy-to-follow trail. The west ridge (and the entire NW face of SS) is pretty steep, but I found it to be manageable class 2 (I have only done a few of the easier class 3 routes like Kelso, Sneffels, Longs, Wetterhorn, Kit Carson for comparison). I found the correct gully very easily - the pictures on the route description are perfectly helpful. I also was able to study the entire route by looking down during the traverse from RC to SS, where you can see the entire route. I started to descend the gully and then quickly realized that this was not for me. It is very steep and very loose. It is just a slide of dirt as far as I could tell. I didn't have hiking poles or an ice ax, and I decided that I would rather ascend the 800 feet back to SS (and then the 500 feet back to RC) than go down that gully. And that is exactly what I did (that right there should tell you how scary that gully looked). I have done the descent off Columbia (the 14er) and Challenger and Bross and this looked way worse (although it is short - maybe only 200-300 vertical feet). I never really learned how to descend stuff like that (if there is even a "correct technique"), so maybe its not really that bad if you know what you are doing. I think the only way to do it is to slide on your butt using hiking poles to control your speed. I have no idea how you would go up it.
The gully next to the correct one was filled in with snow, so maybe an ice ax and microspikes would be a better decision.
I never thought of going up and over Sundog and then dealing with the downhill bushwacking back to the car, but I hadn't researched this at all, so it wasn't an option for me at the time.
One other thing to consider is that if you attempt to go down the gully, then you are "only" 800 vertical feet (and less than a half mile) from the standard trail if you decide not to do it. Plus there is the Sundog option if you research that ahead of time. But, if you attempt to go up the gully, then you are 1.5 miles and 1500 vertical feet from the standard trail if you decide to turn around.
I will also warn you that it is a long way from SS back to RC, so the loop is definitely attractive. When I do it again, I will look into the Sundog option.

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2020 12:18 pm
by Scott P
Wish I lived in CO wrote: Mon Jul 06, 2020 9:59 pm
Ptglhs wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2020 5:11 pm
RobLowe wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:31 am Ptg... Sundog is a fun alternative. There is no sign preventing one from going down Sunshine and then down the gully between Sunshine and Sundog.
The sign in question is between sunshine and Red Cloud. You are correct there is no signage, and not much of a trail, between sunshine and sundog.
Yeh, below is a visual of the closed area, different than the alternate route.
I have done that alternate route, but unless the route is snow covered, it is aweful. It also kills the point of having the earlier route closed since this route is much more erosion prone.

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2020 8:47 pm
by nmjameswilson
I did this a few days ago and went back over Redcloud. It's really not that much to do

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2020 8:58 pm
by Wentzl
Scott P wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2020 12:18 pm
Wish I lived in CO wrote: Mon Jul 06, 2020 9:59 pm
Ptglhs wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2020 5:11 pm

The sign in question is between sunshine and Red Cloud. You are correct there is no signage, and not much of a trail, between sunshine and sundog.
Yeh, below is a visual of the closed area, different than the alternate route.
I have done that alternate route, but unless the route is snow covered, it is aweful. It also kills the point of having the earlier route closed since this route is much more erosion prone.
Aweful? IS that a good thing or bad?

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2020 10:44 am
by DeTour
I will dissent a bit from the prevailing opinion here. We did the Northwest Face approach to Sunshine in 2012, and while the scree gully did indeed suck, it's the only objectionable part of the route and I didn't think it was as dangerous as some have described here. The top part of the gully was steep enough to be sketchy, but it's coarse scree sand, not rubble. My read was that any potential rockfall, or a slip by a person, would be slowed by that soft sand and wouldn't likely go too far (although I did say I wouldn't want to test that theory). And it's not that long. The total gully is in the 400-500' vertical, but only the top third or so is steep. Anyway, bottom line for me is that it was not a "never again" kind of situation.

However, I will throw in with the Sundog promoters, even though I didn't do it. At the time, looking up at Sundog, I wished we had chosen that route. I was thinking one would still do the route counter-clockwise, turning off the main trail at Silver Creek the same way we did for the basin, but veering slightly right to ascend the north ridge of Sundog. But if there's a lot of bushwhacking, maybe a clockwise route with a descent of Sundog is a better option.

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2020 3:41 pm
by Trotter
just tag on sundog

Re: Redcloud/Sunshine loop direction suggestions

Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 6:57 am
by 76dorihe
Jim Davies wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2020 5:09 pm Save yourself the misery and go back over Redcloud. Remember the rule: if it isn't the normal route, there's a reason. Learn from the experience of the masses.
"I took the road less traveled.....and it has made all the difference."