Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
-wren-
Posts: 284
Joined: 3/24/2021
14ers: 51  3 
13ers: 109 6
Trip Reports (0)
 

Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by -wren- »

Map: https://listsofjohn.com/PeakStats/Conte ... p?lid=2350

List: https://listsofjohn.com/steepness/angle ... =&state=CO

For those unaware, Tim Worth has put a painstaking amount of effort into calculating the average slope angle of all the ranked Contiguous US peaks on Lists of John, and there are lists of the Cont. US 1000 steepest as well as each Western state's 100 steepest on the site. More so than elevation and prominence, I have always loved this metric as a way to explore interesting/impressive peaks in states other than CO. One thing that always bothered me was there wasn't a way to view these all laid out on a map, so with some free time over a few days I duplicated the list so it would be viewable as one. I think it's quite interesting to see the density of steep geography laid out on a map like this. CA, WA, MT, UT, AZ and WY sure do put us to shame! Anyhow hopefully this is of interest to some of you, I certainly find it entertaining to browse through.

P.S. there are 2 peaks missing from the map, I must have glazed over them, and have no desire to figure out which ones they are, so I apologize!
User avatar
Jorts
Posts: 1122
Joined: 4/12/2013
14ers: 58  4  2 
13ers: 102 12 5
Trip Reports (11)
 

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by Jorts »

Nice compilation. Thanks for sharing.
Traveling light is the only way to fly.
IG: @colorado_invasive
Strava: Brent Herring
seano
Posts: 779
Joined: 6/9/2010
14ers: 56 
13ers: 218
Trip Reports (3)
 
Contact:

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by seano »

Thanks for sharing a very interesting list! I'm a bit surprised about some familiar things that don't make the list, like Organ Needle, Pedernal, and Cabezon down here in NM, but it also points to some really obscure goodies, like Cerro Alesna, which I've only looked at from the super-remote dirt road nearby.

EDIT: Whoa, looks like I'm somehow the LoJ leader on this one... Kinda surprising, since I only just now became aware of it. 🤷‍♂️
Last edited by seano on Thu Jan 13, 2022 9:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
justiner
Posts: 4412
Joined: 8/28/2010
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 138
Trip Reports (40)
 
Contact:

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by justiner »

Huh, that's an interesting idea, with some curious results. I was surprised to see Chief's Head, since the western flank of it is fairly tame all the way down to the col between it and Mt. Alice, as well its SE ridge to Mt. Orton. The Glacier Gorge sided faces are indeed quite steep.
User avatar
-wren-
Posts: 284
Joined: 3/24/2021
14ers: 51  3 
13ers: 109 6
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by -wren- »

justiner wrote: Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:09 pm Huh, that's an interesting idea, with some curious results. I was surprised to see Chief's Head, since the western flank of it is fairly tame all the way down to the col between it and Mt. Alice, as well its SE ridge to Mt. Orton. The Glacier Gorge sided faces are indeed quite steep.
There are many, many peaks on the list with either one very steep feature or a steep summit block and otherwise tame terrain (like sheep peak in AZ). Not a perfect metric but definitely showcases some of the finer obscure peaks in the nation. Particularly I love how it highlights just how gnarly the North Cascades are, only the Winds, Sierra and Glacier really come close as far as alpine terrain is concerned.
Last edited by -wren- on Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Scott P
Posts: 9446
Joined: 5/4/2005
14ers: 58  16 
13ers: 50 13
Trip Reports (16)
 
Contact:

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by Scott P »

Nice! That's a great map!
CA, WA, MT, UT, AZ and WY sure do put us to shame!
For sure. With the exception of Nevada, Colorado's mountains are overall the least rugged of the Western states. It's mostly due to most of the ranges being old and folded mountains. For better or worse, they are the easiest (on average) to climb. That means you can really bag a lot of peaks quickly here.
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
User avatar
twhalm
Posts: 95
Joined: 8/23/2010
14ers: 57  2 
13ers: 43
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by twhalm »

How is steepness defined here? I feel like the changes to the definition could substantially change a list like this.
seano
Posts: 779
Joined: 6/9/2010
14ers: 56 
13ers: 218
Trip Reports (3)
 
Contact:

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by seano »

twhalm wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 1:29 pm How is steepness defined here? I feel like the changes to the definition could substantially change a list like this.
I'm not sure. It's different from, and seems more primitive than, Spire Measure (gory details).
User avatar
mike offerman
Posts: 210
Joined: 8/9/2005
14ers: 58 
13ers: 189
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by mike offerman »

twhalm wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 1:29 pm How is steepness defined here? I feel like the changes to the definition could substantially change a list like this.
per the LOJ page

https://listsofjohn.com/steepness/?State=CO

Steepest Average Angle at 100m lists originally
created/conceptualized by Tim Worth using
National Elevation Dataset and LoJ peak data
User avatar
twhalm
Posts: 95
Joined: 8/23/2010
14ers: 57  2 
13ers: 43
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by twhalm »

mike offerman wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:19 pm per the LOJ page

https://listsofjohn.com/steepness/?State=CO

Steepest Average Angle at 100m lists originally
created/conceptualized by Tim Worth using
National Elevation Dataset and LoJ peak data
Thanks. That is pretty arbitrary. I wonder how much the list would change if something like 300m was chosen or if it was an average of averages at different slices of elevation.
User avatar
bdloftin77
Posts: 1090
Joined: 9/23/2013
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 58
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by bdloftin77 »

twhalm wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:06 am
mike offerman wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:19 pm per the LOJ page

https://listsofjohn.com/steepness/?State=CO

Steepest Average Angle at 100m lists originally
created/conceptualized by Tim Worth using
National Elevation Dataset and LoJ peak data
Thanks. That is pretty arbitrary. I wonder how much the list would change if something like 300m was chosen or if it was an average of averages at different slices of elevation.
He also has 800m on his current website: http://summitsteepness.com/
And 1600m on an older version: https://web.archive.org/web/20180817011 ... es/co.html
User avatar
martinleroux
Posts: 299
Joined: 4/6/2012
14ers: 28 
13ers: 23
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Contiguous US 1000 Steepest: Map/List

Post by martinleroux »

twhalm wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:06 am
mike offerman wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:19 pm per the LOJ page

https://listsofjohn.com/steepness/?State=CO

Steepest Average Angle at 100m lists originally created/conceptualized by Tim Worth using National Elevation Dataset and LoJ peak data
Thanks. That is pretty arbitrary. I wonder how much the list would change if something like 300m was chosen or if it was an average of averages at different slices of elevation.
That's basically the idea behind the Spire Measure mentioned in seano's post above (a.k.a. "Omnidirectional Relief and Steepness" or ORS) . If I'm reading the description correctly, here's how ORS works:
  1. For any given direction and base distance (B) from a given summit, measure the "point-to-point relief and steepness" (PPRS), defined as the drop-off in height (H) multiplied by the slope angle, i.e. H * arctan(H/B).
  2. Calculate the average PPRS for all base distances in that direction. More precisely, calculate the root-mean-square, i.e. the square root of the average of (PPRS squared) for all values of B.
  3. Finally, calculate the average of the average PPRS in all directions. This is the ORS.
ORS has the advantage that it doesn't depend on an arbitrary choice of base distance. The peaks with the highest ORS are generally quite prominent, although a very prominent peak such as Denali doesn't have as high an ORS as Mt St Elias, say, which isn't quite as prominent but is generally steeper. A formation such as The Titan would have quite a modest ORS because it's not very prominent, even though the top part is very steep in all directions, at least for a few hundred feet.

One issue with both ORS and average steepness is that a peak with an easy approach can still have a high score if it has a very steep drop-off in most directions. I'd be more interested in peaks that don't have an easy approach in any direction. In other words, instead of calculating the average steepness (or relief-and-steepness) in all directions, calculate a peak's lowest steepness in any direction. (In practice one would have to take the 99th percentile, or something like that). But I don't have access to the computer resources that would be needed to do this.
Post Reply