Fully Realizing the 3000ft Rule

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
XterraRob
Posts: 1132
Joined: 7/20/2015
14ers: 42  7 
13ers: 14
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Fully Realizing the 3000ft Rule

Post by XterraRob »

I usually park as high as I can go, then claim the 3000' & summit.
RIP - M56
Re-introduce Grizzly Bears into the Colorado Wilderness™
User avatar
OldTrad
Posts: 275
Joined: 2/12/2017
14ers: 36 
13ers: 10
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Fully Realizing the 3000ft Rule

Post by OldTrad »

XterraRob wrote: Fri Jan 22, 2021 11:36 am I usually park as high as I can go, then claim the 3000' & summit.
+1
ltlFish99
Posts: 619
Joined: 5/21/2019
14ers: 49  3  2 
13ers: 51
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Fully Realizing the 3000ft Rule

Post by ltlFish99 »

nyker wrote: Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:14 pm I felt that when I had to walk up Lake Como road three separate times for each of the 14ers there, I should have some allowance built up in elevation credit to use on a peak like Lincoln! :lol:
HA. We can always look at it that way,
or if I hike the como road to camp. Gain less than 3k hiking any of the peaks, but gained approximately 4k backpacking to camp, then it does not count.
Therefore I will be required to hike all of them separately from a low point on the como road in order for me to claim an official 3k gained, 14er summit.

PS. Funny you mentioned Lincoln. When I hike Cameron I was noticing that I either start from Montgomery reservoir, or just a little past alma if coming from kite lake.
Last edited by ltlFish99 on Sat Jan 23, 2021 3:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ltlFish99
Posts: 619
Joined: 5/21/2019
14ers: 49  3  2 
13ers: 51
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Fully Realizing the 3000ft Rule

Post by ltlFish99 »

timewarp01 wrote: Tue Jan 19, 2021 8:28 pm
Eli Watson wrote: Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:38 pm Democrat (14,148'), Cameron (14,238'), Lincoln (14,286') & Bross (14,172')
Kite Lake TH (12,000'): No
Mineral Park TH (11,400'): No
Montgomery Reservoir Parking (10,900'): Yes
Paris Mill Parking en route to Kite Lake TH (11,000'): Yes
Quartzville TH (11,650'): No

Parking at Paris Mill adds 2.7 mi each way.
Surely a true 3k rule purist would retract Cameron from consideration. You can't nitpick elevation gain rules without also nitpicking prominence rules; that's just inconsistent. And if you insist on including it the least you could do is include South Bross too.
I thought south bross was included on the list of 74.
That being points in Colorado over 14,000 feet.
Of course, some argue it should be 75 points, which would include sunlight spire. Although at 13,995 I am not sure how it qualifies.
timisimaginary
Posts: 777
Joined: 11/19/2017
14ers: 3 
13ers: 1
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Fully Realizing the 3000ft Rule

Post by timisimaginary »

pvnisher wrote: Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:24 am You know how 13er folks are even snobbier than 14er people?
Well, those 7er people are cray cray.
and don't even start on the low-pointers. you'll need to descend 3000 ft if you want those bragging rights. you can't claim to bag Badwater Basin unless you start at least 2718' above sea level. you better have a lot of vacation time saved up if you want to shoot for bagging the Florida low-point.
"The decay and disintegration of this culture is astonishingly amusing if you're emotionally detached from it." - George Carlin
Dayute
Posts: 96
Joined: 8/13/2017
14ers: 56  1 
13ers: 10 1
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Fully Realizing the 3000ft Rule

Post by Dayute »

RobLowe wrote: Fri Jan 22, 2021 9:49 am 12ersRule— I am not questioning whether it is an accomplishment; it unquestionably is!

I am questioning the motivation behind the accomplishment. That is, wanting to brag.
My motivation for climbing something is honestly none of your business. I get that you may have some issues that prevent you from understanding sarcasm but to continue to follow me to PM just to tell me that no one will care about my accomplishments because they're not 8000M peaks is pretty douchey. How do you know what all other people will care about? My friends must be much more easily impressed than the people you hang out with.
CORed
Posts: 188
Joined: 8/24/2011
14ers: 10  1 
13ers: 10 2
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Fully Realizing the 3000ft Rule

Post by CORed »

Carl_Healy wrote: Tue Jan 19, 2021 8:51 pm As I said in another post...

I don't think any summit counts unless you start your route from sea level.
Makes for a pretty long hike for any summit in Colorado.
Post Reply