Colorado LiDAR Findings

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
bdloftin77
Posts: 1090
Joined: 9/23/2013
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 58
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by bdloftin77 »

For those who asked about lidar-based contour maps...

The USGS is doing a pilot study on custom auto-generated contour maps (though probably not including the newly analyzed peak spot elevations that we've been working on, now shown in LoJ). For a limited time, they're offering a free "on demand custom topographic map builder." They will be created from the "best available National Map data, cartography, and standards." This probably includes lidar-based DEMs (class 2 ground points) where that data is available.

Here's a link to the main page: https://www.usgs.gov/news/technical-ann ... aphic-maps
And here's a link to the topoBuilder applicaton: https://topobuilder.nationalmap.gov/

Enjoy!
User avatar
Boggy B
Posts: 785
Joined: 10/14/2009
14ers: 58  7 
13ers: 777 76
Trip Reports (40)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Boggy B »

bdloftin77 wrote: Thu Jun 30, 2022 5:19 pm I looked at Hayden, Middle Mountain, and Little Baldy recently. None cross the 13k mark. The next closest officially named 12er is now West Sheridan at 12,962'. It's unlikely that it's above 13k ft. Yeah, we tried to cover the map P280-299 ones as best as we could.

I'll also be checking some more 13ers near the Centennial and Bicentennial boundaries to make sure there aren't any further changes with those lists. Arkansas, 13975, and Garfield are not in the highest 100. It's also unlikely that 13768 is in the top 100. John's on a trip right now, so LoJ hasn't yet been updated with these results yet.
Thanks Ben!
Skimo95
Posts: 416
Joined: 5/19/2021
14ers: 58  13  23 
13ers: 176 8
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Skimo95 »

Was Clark the only bicent to be knocked off?
User avatar
Tornadoman
Posts: 1438
Joined: 7/30/2007
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 266 35
Trip Reports (12)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Tornadoman »

Skimo95 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:57 am Was Clark the only bicent to be knocked off?
Here's what I see at a quick look although I might be missing something.

Wood Mountain (Not Ranked)
Lightning Pyramid (Not Ranked)
13,580A- San Juans- Now 13,573- Demoted
13,580B- Sangres- Now 13,543- Demoted
Mt. Powell Gore- (13,556')- Demoted

Also, Clark is at 13,579 and tied with Rosalie in elevation at the 200 mark. I think most Bicent chasers would want to include Clark still.
Climb the mountain so you can see the world, not so the world can see you.
User avatar
climbingcue
Posts: 992
Joined: 10/11/2011
14ers: 58  8  27 
13ers: 318 22 11
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by climbingcue »

Tornadoman wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 12:15 pm
Skimo95 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:57 am Was Clark the only bicent to be knocked off?
Here's what I see at a quick look although I might be missing something.

Wood Mountain (Not Ranked)
Lightning Pyramid (Not Ranked)
13,580A- San Juans- Now 13,573- Demoted
13,580B- Sangres- Now 13,543- Demoted
Mt. Powell Gore- (13,556')- Demoted

Also, Clark is at 13,579 and tied with Rosalie in elevation at the 200 mark. I think most Bicent chasers would want to include Clark still.
The updated Colorado top 200 peaks on listsofjohn does not have Clark listed as being in the 200 highest. I am still planning on climbing it, being dropped does not change that.

Bill
Consecutive months with at least one 13er or 14er, 73 months
User avatar
bdloftin77
Posts: 1090
Joined: 9/23/2013
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 58
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by bdloftin77 »

Tornadoman wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 12:15 pm Also, Clark is at 13,579 and tied with Rosalie in elevation at the 200 mark. I think most Bicent chasers would want to include Clark still.
Yeah, the only reason Clark is listed lower than Rosalie is because it’s less prominent (peaks are listed in order of descending elevation, then prominence, then isolation). So still tied for the highest 200th peak.

Gibbs had a big cairn that was excluded, otherwise it would be listed a few feet higher.
Skimo95
Posts: 416
Joined: 5/19/2021
14ers: 58  13  23 
13ers: 176 8
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Skimo95 »

.
Last edited by Skimo95 on Wed Aug 17, 2022 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mtnman200
Posts: 1112
Joined: 9/26/2012
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 440
Trip Reports (85)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Mtnman200 »

Skimo95 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:57 am Was Clark the only bicent to be knocked off?
Here's what's changed for bicentennial chasers. Feel free to correct me if necessary.

No longer ranked:
Challenger Point (14,086'; was 14,081')
Lightning Pyramid (13,729'; was 13,722')
Wood Mountain (13,682'; was 13,660')

No longer unranked:
North Maroon Peak (14,022'; was 14,014')

Summit moved:
Unnamed 13,660's summit is now 13,656' and has moved down the ridge toward Ellingwood Point

Promoted to bicentennials:
Mt. Parnassus (13,580'; was 13,574')
Rosalie Peak (13,579'; was 13,575'); tied with Clark Peak (13,579'; was 13,580'), which remains a bicentennial
Mt. Evans B (13,591'; was 13,577')
West Apostle (13,597'; was 13,568')

Demoted to tricentennials:
Unnamed 13,573' (was 13,580'); near Pole Creek Mtn.
Unnamed 13,543' (was 13,580'); near Mt. Adams
Mt. Powell (13,556'; was 13,580')
"Adventure without risk is not possible." - Reinhold Messner
User avatar
Bigfoot
Posts: 63
Joined: 6/25/2008
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 19
Trip Reports (0)
 
Contact:

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Bigfoot »

Mtnman200 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 2:43 pm Here's what's changed for bicentennial chasers. Feel free to correct me if necessary.

Summit moved:
Unnamed 13,660's summit is now 13,656' and has moved down the ridge toward Ellingwood Point
I seem to remember that the summit of Mt. Buckskin moved as well.
User avatar
dwoodward13
Posts: 743
Joined: 3/26/2011
14ers: 58  12 
13ers: 157 6
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by dwoodward13 »

Bigfoot wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 4:08 pm
Mtnman200 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 2:43 pm Here's what's changed for bicentennial chasers. Feel free to correct me if necessary.

Summit moved:
Unnamed 13,660's summit is now 13,656' and has moved down the ridge toward Ellingwood Point
I seem to remember that the summit of Mt. Buckskin moved as well.
Yes. It moved from the marked summit to the high mark further to the west.
User avatar
Mtnman200
Posts: 1112
Joined: 9/26/2012
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 440
Trip Reports (85)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Mtnman200 »

dwoodward13 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 4:39 pm
Bigfoot wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 4:08 pm
Mtnman200 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 2:43 pm Here's what's changed for bicentennial chasers. Feel free to correct me if necessary.

Summit moved:
Unnamed 13,660's summit is now 13,656' and has moved down the ridge toward Ellingwood Point
I seem to remember that the summit of Mt. Buckskin moved as well.
Yes. It moved from the marked summit to the high mark further to the west.
Thanks to Bigfoot for catching that, and thanks to Davis for providing confirmation. Essentially, LIDAR showed that what used to be Buckskin's false summit is actually the true summit. (The former true summit is shown as 13,865' on the topo map.)
"Adventure without risk is not possible." - Reinhold Messner
User avatar
XterraRob
Posts: 1130
Joined: 7/20/2015
14ers: 42  7 
13ers: 14
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by XterraRob »

Does anyone have a copy of the Save Sunshine picture featuring the Chinook?
RIP - M56
Re-introduce Grizzly Bears into the Colorado Wilderness™
Post Reply