Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Trailhead condition requests, questions, alerts, etc.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
Jim Davies
Posts: 7639
Joined: 6/8/2006
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 67
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by Jim Davies »

This year is unusual, because the competing entertainment for people and their kids is shut down. Bad time to do a study, if you ask me...
Climbing at altitude is like hitting your head against a brick wall — it's great when you stop. -- Chris Darwin
I'm pretty tired. I think I'll go home now. -- Forrest Gump
peter303
Posts: 3539
Joined: 6/17/2009
14ers: 34 
13ers: 12
Trip Reports (3)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by peter303 »

There is the Kalifornia solution around the corner: fee-permits on Whitney and Half Dome. :o
User avatar
SolarAlex
Posts: 529
Joined: 8/15/2011
14ers: 35  13  5 
13ers: 92 23 5
Trip Reports (21)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by SolarAlex »

Can't see buses really achieving much, unless they strictly enforce no parking along Blue Lakes rd and highway 9 and start running the buses at 5 or 6am. Even by Quandary standards, the crowds have been off the charts this year. Cars are routinely parked for a 1/2 mile in either direction on highway 9 , and all up and down the blue lake and mccollough gulch roads.I've always felt really bad for the guy who lives in that house on the corner, even more so now. Can't imagine what that must be like living there with 24/7 noise and traffic.
Vincit Qui Patitur
Ptglhs
Posts: 1486
Joined: 1/6/2016
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 86 3
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by Ptglhs »

SolarAlex wrote: Tue Jul 21, 2020 7:23 pm Can't see buses really achieving much, unless they strictly enforce no parking along Blue Lakes rd and highway 9 and start running the buses at 5 or 6am. Even by Quandary standards, the crowds have been off the charts this year. Cars are routinely parked for a 1/2 mile in either direction on highway 9 , and all up and down the blue lake and mccollough gulch roads.I've always felt really bad for the guy who lives in that house on the corner, even more so now. Can't imagine what that must be like living there with 24/7 noise and traffic.
Unemployment which is hitting CO hard and the resort towns harder means people have more time on their hands. Normal recreational activities being shut down means people are more likely to be outdoors. A total lack of imagination and a fixation with the 14k line means a perfect storm on the easier front range / Tensquito peaks. Why they can't hike Fletcher and see 5% of the people on quandary mystifies me.
User avatar
mtnkub
Posts: 420
Joined: 8/7/2009
14ers: 58  1  7 
13ers: 116 4 4
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by mtnkub »

Ptglhs wrote: Tue Jul 21, 2020 7:36 pm A total lack of imagination and a fixation with the 14k line means a perfect storm on the easier front range / Tensquito peaks. Why they can't hike Fletcher and see 5% of the people on quandary mystifies me.
Well (a) i'm glad that this lack of imagination makes things more predictable, and (b) Fletcher does call for a little more mountain craft than Quandary, imho.
User avatar
wildlobo71
Posts: 2081
Joined: 4/1/2008
14ers: 58  5 
13ers: 88
Trip Reports (3)
 
Contact:

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by wildlobo71 »

Jim Davies wrote: Tue Jul 21, 2020 3:55 pm This year is unusual, because the competing entertainment for people and their kids is shut down. Bad time to do a study, if you ask me...
Actually it's a good year to study a max capacity effect... the fact they aren't starting the study until middle August is my big concern, the deeper we push past Labor Day with studies, the lower the max effect will be observed. The numbers we (or whomever wins the bid for the project) arrive at in 2020 will probably actually be realistic base numbers in 2024-2026 if positive growth continues as planned., maybe sooner if - as you say - those who used to sit and watch the game are now inclined to go for a hike.
Bill W.

Time for the next great losing streak to begin.
#forcedrefocus
thatmushroom
Posts: 118
Joined: 6/4/2014
14ers: 15  1 
13ers: 20 1 1
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by thatmushroom »

I can't believe no one has suggested taking a bunch of hydraulic jacks and raising up some of the highest 13ers. Bam, more 14er options for the crowds to choose from, fewer high-use concerns for a few years.
Ptglhs
Posts: 1486
Joined: 1/6/2016
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 86 3
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by Ptglhs »

mtnkub wrote: Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:44 pm Fletcher does call for a little more mountain craft than Quandary, imho.
Perhaps a bit, though I'd say someone who could handle Lincoln or Bierstadt, etc, could handle Fletcher's southeast Ridge.

Your thoughts?
User avatar
cougar
Posts: 1181
Joined: 8/9/2007
14ers: 58  2 
13ers: 135 2
Trip Reports (10)
 
Contact:

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by cougar »

Image
http://www.listsofjohn.com/m/cougar

"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going."
"Bushwhacking is like a box of chocolates - you never know what you're gonna get."
"Don't give up on your dreams, stay asleep"
User avatar
Eli Boardman
Posts: 662
Joined: 6/23/2016
14ers: 58  1  15 
13ers: 18 1
Trip Reports (16)
 
Contact:

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by Eli Boardman »

thatmushroom wrote: Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:54 pm I can't believe no one has suggested taking a bunch of hydraulic jacks and raising up some of the highest 13ers. Bam, more 14er options for the crowds to choose from, fewer high-use concerns for a few years.
Easier to just dynamite the top of each and every 14er until they're all 13,999; then human impact in the mountains would go to zero because climbing 13ers is just a waste of time.
letitbeirie
Posts: 65
Joined: 6/26/2015
14ers: 16 
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by letitbeirie »

peter303 wrote: Tue Jul 21, 2020 4:59 pm There is the Kalifornia solution around the corner: fee-permits on Whitney and Half Dome. :o
(this idea will probably be about as well-liked as a fart in a spacesuit, but here goes)

There's also the New England solution: alternate routes.

The 20th anniversary edition of the Bourneman & Lampert guide, published 1998, includes this preface:
The third edition, 20th Anniversary Printing of this guide is published in cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service in an attempt to encourage the use of one or two minimum-impact trails or clearly established routes to each Fourteener. ... We decided that in a guidebook to such heavily used peaks as the Fourteeners, the most environmentally responsible approach is to recommend that climbers and hikers stay on established trailes or routes. The days of wandering over mountainsides and descending any scree slope are over. Too many have done that for too long, and the resulting damage on Mount Yale, La Plata Peak, Uncompahgre Peak, and many others will take generations to heal.
There's nothing wrong with what they wrote - it's more true than ever - but that's just half of the issue now. From the same preface:
I deeply miss "the good old days." During the summer of 1972, Omar Richardson and I climbed seventeen Fourteeners - and encountered only two other people the entire summer. ... In the summer of 1992 - on a weekday - I shared Elbert's slopes with at least fifty others.
Concentrating all the use each 14er gets on 1-2 trails made a ton of sense in the 90s, when the main concern was a maze of steep, eroding social trails and it was possible to unironically complain about seeing 50 people on Elbert on a summer afternoon. Dirt trails however can only support so much traffic - any footpath in a non-wilderness area that sees the kind of traffic Elbert gets would have been paved years ago. Clearly that's not going to happen (and nobody wants it to), so that means any long-term workable solution centers around removing traffic (permits) or adding capacity (trails).

Where does New England fit into this? They have tons of popular mountains too - many of them more popular than the 14ers just because of proximity to the population centers along the coast: most of them have multiple hiking options from multiple trailheads, which effectively disperse their traffic load. Discounting the old, discouraged social trails present on most 14ers, AFAIK Elbert has the most varied options with the 2 main trails, Black Cloud, and Echo Canyon; Mt. Washington has 10-12 class 1-2 routes to the top and Katahdin (which is about as far into Maine from Boston as the San Juans are from Denver) has 6-7 routes comparable to the Keyhole on Longs.
User avatar
mtnkub
Posts: 420
Joined: 8/7/2009
14ers: 58  1  7 
13ers: 116 4 4
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: Buses for Quandary appear to be imminent

Post by mtnkub »

Ptglhs wrote: Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:10 pm
mtnkub wrote: Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:44 pm Fletcher does call for a little more mountain craft than Quandary, imho.
Perhaps a bit, though I'd say someone who could handle Lincoln or Bierstadt, etc, could handle Fletcher's southeast Ridge.

Your thoughts?
I agree. Just a bit more rock hopping (if i remember right) and an overall a more adventurous feeling (with a little more route finding).
Post Reply