timisimaginary wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:24 pm
exactly, that's why those secondary handholds are there. pole makers don't just put them there for decoration. same for the straps, too. each one is appropriate for different circumstances, conditions, etc.
certain people with an absolutist mindset can't seem to grasp that concept (maybe they need straps for that?)
I always like your jokes but here's some good truth, too!
BTW,
here are the results of the full meta-analysis that the article summarizes.
It's bizarre to me (but perhaps emblematic of public rhetoric) for people here to be claiming absolute general answers based on their own singular experiences. Hike your own hike!
Clearly, there are enough people using poles with success. And enough people not using poles, with success. And straps, in various configurations and situations.
It's like handhelds vs. hydration packs in trail races -- there are different energetic/heat/convenience costs, but people have been winning either way.
Some of the variables that aren't as exhaustively considered or appreciated in singular examples is weight of pack; steepness of terrain; length of hike (in miles, or days, or weeks); phenotype of hiker (height/weight/musculature/age/cardiovascular fitness); familiarity with poles.
So a young, light runner who has never used poles day-hiking an undulating trail, for example, makes a different optimal choice than, say, a parent carrying their kids' gear up and down mountain passes for a backpacking trip.