Captain, I'd be down to run the winter gauntlet. Tools and 2x 70M dry ropes, gear. Hopefully picking up some AT skis for some fun as well.
PM me.
Adventures,
Clint
Captain, I'd be down to run the winter gauntlet. Tools and 2x 70M dry ropes, gear. Hopefully picking up some AT skis for some fun as well.
That might be overkill for the CT.faultedgeologist wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:26 amCaptain, I'd be down to run the winter gauntlet. Tools and 2x 70M dry ropes, gear. Hopefully picking up some AT skis for some fun as well.
PM me.
Adventures,
Clint
There’s levels to this.. I’ll let you think what you’d like lolSchralpTheGnar wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:48 pmThat might be overkill for the CT.faultedgeologist wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:26 amCaptain, I'd be down to run the winter gauntlet. Tools and 2x 70M dry ropes, gear. Hopefully picking up some AT skis for some fun as well.
PM me.
Adventures,
Clint![]()
This is a slightly tangential question, but does correct use prevent smells from ending up on the outside of the bag? To me that seems darn near impossible, but I haven't looked into this at all. I've only done hangs and cannisters on my backpack trips, and so far have gotten lucky with the former.stephakett wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:48 pmbear hangs are notoriously a bad idea in colorado, due to the abundance of ponderosa pine in our state, which generally do not grow wide enough to accommodate for a hang 15' from the trunk. i know there has been a growing presence of bears on the CT, especially in the beginning segments, and every year hikers are shocked to see their food destroyed.
now i have personally never had a problem with bears at camps, even for a few nights at blue lakes with a poorly-executed hang in an area i KNOW has a lot of bears. there was actually one following me on trail one morning of that trip.
i realize the simple solution is to carry a heavy, locking, plastic canister instead of a soft-sided bag, however, i HATE HATE HATE the idea of lugging a bear canister across the state, almost as much as i think i would hate to find a destroyed cache of food with 50 miles between me and a resupply.
so to my question: has anyone had negative experiences with a ratsack and/or ursack used in conjunction with an odor-proof bag like opsak?
or perhaps the question i'm really asking is, has anyone correctly used an odor proof bag setup and still had an animal destroy all their food?
I've been using a Ursack frequently in Colorado for many years without an odor-proof bag and never has it been messed with.stephakett wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:48 pmso to my question: has anyone had negative experiences with a ratsack and/or ursack used in conjunction with an odor-proof bag like opsak?
i agree - mice are a much bigger problem than bears in my experience on crowded trails/areas. I've seen mice get into the ursack openings so they'll need to be hung. the smell issue is another thing, even if you have everything in ziplocks mice will still smell oils from food/salt/etc on the bagsezabielski wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 4:17 pmIf I did the Colorado Trail again I would use the Ursack Minor and just sleep with it. The mice are kind of crazy in Colorado. One ate part of my shirt overnight! Another ate through a pocket in my backpack.
I think it's hilarious though that people (naturally terrible at smelling things) think their opsack, usually a few weeks old, very crinkled, with a questionable zipper, is anywhere close to odor proof. No bear is being fooled by that. The fact that bears don't bother you is mostly that bears on the Colorado Trail are afraid of humans and won't bother you even if your food was not in bear proof storage.