Is this accurate?

Camera equipment and technique for taking photos.
Forum rules
Please do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website. For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
davidponak
Posts: 9
Joined: 12/28/2012
14ers: 11 2
13ers: 22 4
Contact:

Re: Is this accurate?

Post by davidponak » Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:27 am

I wish I could credit these but they were downloaded and saved to my computer a while ago.
Image
and
Image
User avatar
highpilgrim
Posts: 3110
Joined: 3/14/2008
14ers: 58
13ers: 82 1
Trip Reports (1)

Re: Is this accurate?

Post by highpilgrim » Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:55 am

FWIW, Google earth can answer nearly any question you have like this one.

Here is your original image with the peak in question:
original.JPG
original.JPG (40.87 KiB) Viewed 1347 times
Here is a sceen cap from about the correct location from Google Earth (I didn't fuss with getting the vertical aspect quite right, but you can and it's also a little closer than yours):
one.jpg
one.jpg (231.54 KiB) Viewed 1338 times
Here is a screen cap from above complete with label. All of the surrounding peaks are also noted with green mountain icons which can be hovered over for more specific information.
2.jpg
2.jpg (272.1 KiB) Viewed 1347 times
Call on God, but row away from the rocks.
Hunter S Thompson

Walk away from the droning and leave the hive behind.
Dick Derkase
User avatar
jaymz
Posts: 1012
Joined: 6/6/2006
14ers: List not added
Trip Reports (1)

Re: Is this accurate?

Post by jaymz » Fri Dec 20, 2013 11:08 am

iholdthepain wrote:Interesting this topic comes up. I live a little north, in Loveland. From my house, you can see two peaks beyond the foothills, just north of where storm peak drops down, in the gap between Longs and the Mummy range. Sometimes, I've been certain they were Hallet and Otis, other times, I've thought McHenry's and Powell, but then I think those would definitely be covered by the Longs/ Storm saddle. My specific vantage point is from I-25 and US34. The southern peak looks like an ocean wave moving south, and the northern peak is a symmetrical cone. It's obviously on the divide, with a glacier between them, facing me. In my OCD, I've scoured topo maps and photos, but I've never figured it out or found the correct camera angle. From the OP's photos, the angle would be from about 20 miles straight north, but the north end of the photo stops short of Longs.

Anyone?
Does this by any chance show what you're looking for?
Attachments
From Loveland.jpg
From Loveland.jpg (57.72 KiB) Viewed 1285 times
"...as if you could kill time without injuring eternity."
- Thoreau, Walden
User avatar
iholdthepain
Posts: 69
Joined: 7/31/2012
14ers: List not added

Re: Is this accurate?

Post by iholdthepain » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:08 pm

HP - I messed around with Google Earth a lot, but couldn't figure it out.

Jaymz - YES! That's a perfect sketch from my viewpoint... Otis and Hallet they are; mystery solved :-D

Thanks... I'll have to check out PeakFinder.
User avatar
cougar
Posts: 900
Joined: 8/9/2007
14ers: 44 2
13ers: 93 2
Trip Reports (10)
Contact:

Re: Is this accurate?

Post by cougar » Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:21 pm

iholdthepain, here is the rest of the panorama past longs/meeker. Does this show what your looking for?

Image
4 by Aaron Spong Fine Art, on Flickr
the left (south) summit of Twin Sisters is actually Twin Sisters Mountain or the 'South Sister' - 11,376 ft. The two elevations you list are west and east sister (east is the higher one)
User avatar
spong0949
Posts: 183
Joined: 7/25/2008
14ers: 49 1
13ers: 45
Trip Reports (26)
Contact:

Re: Is this accurate?

Post by spong0949 » Fri Dec 20, 2013 10:51 pm

cougar wrote:
iholdthepain, here is the rest of the panorama past longs/meeker. Does this show what your looking for?

Image
4 by Aaron Spong Fine Art, on Flickr
the left (south) summit of Twin Sisters is actually Twin Sisters Mountain or the 'South Sister' - 11,376 ft. The two elevations you list are west and east sister (east is the higher one)
Thank you! This has been very helpful! And thanks for the tips on google earth and peakfinder. I definitely will be looking into these. I'd never heard of peakfinder before.
Mountain photography and fine art:
https://aaron-spong.pixels.com/

Blog:
http://14erart.com

"SOLI DEO GLORIA"
User avatar
litote312
Posts: 88
Joined: 9/11/2013
14ers: 58 1
13ers: 17
Trip Reports (3)

Re: Is this accurate?

Post by litote312 » Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:17 am

This is awesome, I've been trying to mentally compile a peak ID of all these but the panorama saved me a lot of work.
Don't bash each other; bash willows.
User avatar
Aardvark
Posts: 59
Joined: 10/28/2009
14ers: 14
13ers: 3
Trip Reports (1)

Re: Is this accurate?

Post by Aardvark » Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:42 am

http://www.heywhatsthat.com/ is another resource. Just click your location and submit a request. The panorama view isn't that great, but it gives a lot of information.
Post Reply