Bindings! What's the word?

Info, conditions and gear related to skiing or riding Colorado Peaks, including the 14ers!
Forum rules
Please do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website. For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
DaneFisher
Posts: 1
Joined: 8/22/2018
14ers: List not added

Bindings! What's the word?

Post by DaneFisher » Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:06 pm

I'm trying to get all geared up for the spring season in Colorado and wondering particularly about bindings: trying to decide between the G3 Ion 12 LTs, G3 Zed 12s, BD Helio 145, and Salomon MTN bindings. But more generally I thought others might also be interested in bindings gear talk as a whole. Naturally I'm trying to balance weight and performance, but not sure if the G3s will be too heavy or if the BD Helio will perform too poorly on steep couloirs (thinking Holy Cross Couloir type terrain). I know Shifts are a dream, but at almost 4lbs they are way heavier than I'd like. Any input is cherished, even talking about the rest of your setup and how all your gear works together. I am intending to mount them on some Blizzard Zero Gs either 85mm or 95mm (feel free to weigh in there) and am 165lbs, 6ft. I've done all the 14ers in summer and lugged all 15lbs of my inbounds skis up Tuning Fork Couloir on Torrey's last spring and subsequently greatly felt the need to cut weight.
User avatar
cottonmountaineering
Posts: 566
Joined: 5/11/2018
14ers:summits58 ski6 winter18 
13ers:summits165 ski25 winter28 

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by cottonmountaineering » Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:22 pm

IMO don't go too light if you are skiing 14ers, light skis/bindings will be harder to control if the snow isnt absolutely perfect

for bindings i like the dynafits with the rotating toe (dynafit st, rotation, look hm rotation), i dont feel comfortable that the low tech/lightweight pin bindings will release when they need to, and stay in when they need to. other good options are the shift, vipec, kingpin

95 width skis are about right for spring, i have salomon qst 106 skis for an all arounder
User avatar
Bale
Posts: 137
Joined: 6/9/2020
14ers: List not added

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by Bale » Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:38 pm

IMO, those BD Helios are the best on your list, light, simple, and tough. They are rebranded Italian ATK Trofeos and if you are worried about retention, don’t be.
Obviously, if retention is more important than release, get the #10 spring and lock the toes, and if you want to ski stuff like Pyramid, get a beefier binding like Cotton said.

\/ Bean, I take “extreme” to mean simply, “if you fall, you die”. In that case I’m getting the burliest alpine bindings I can find and cranking them to like DIN 18. (For me the point is moot since I don’t ski stuff like that.)
Last edited by Bale on Thu Jan 14, 2021 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
The earth, like the sun, like the air, belongs to everyone - and to no one. - Edward Abbey
User avatar
Bean
Posts: 2699
Joined: 11/3/2005
14ers:summits37 ski37 winter10 
13ers:summits7 ski3 
Trip Reports (28)
Contact:

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by Bean » Wed Jan 13, 2021 3:44 pm

Something else to consider is how sensitive you are to binding ramp. Some people aren't, at all. Turns out I am, quite a bit. The BD/ATK is pretty flat (0.5mm), and even with an adjustment plate is still pretty moderate and less ramp than most other bindings. The Salomon MTN is mid-range at 8ish mm but a bomber binding. G3 Zed is pretty flat at 4mm and reportedly skis well but there are enough reports of breakage that I wasn't comfortable getting a pair, the Ion is supposed to be pretty solid but has 11mm of delta, and also both G3 bindings are not compatible with standard ski crampons so you have to get G3-specific ones.

Marker Alpinist are something else to consider, I was skeptical of anything Marker but after a couple years they seem to be pretty good on the durability front. I picked up a pair this year, only have one day on them but was very happy with their ski performance.

And I have to strongly disagree on the "get a beefier binding to ski extreme terrain" stuff, IMO bindings are a fantastic place to save weight these days. Control (or lack thereof) will come from your skis and boots a lot more than the interface that connects the two. When I want to be confident I'm staying in my bindings I'll take my dynafit Speed Superlites over pretty much anything else (though I did swap the toes out to speed radicals because I want to pretend I'm rad enough to need the extra 2oz of steel on each foot). They're super sturdy and I will take them over a dynafit rotation-style heel every day of the week.

Pretty much all tech bindings have a type of fall you won't release from, and alpine bindings have a different type of fall you won't release from. If you're worried about spring peak skiing in CO you want to keep your skis on your feet, and binding release characteristics belong pretty low on the priority list anyway.

I have both ZG 85s and 95s, the 85s 171 with speed superlites and the 95s are 185 with Helio 200s, both great skis and sized differently enough that they have very different applications for me. If I had to pick just one, I'd go with the 178 ZG95. I'm pretty similar size as you, 5'11" and about 170lb.
"There are no hard 14ers, but some are easier than others." - Scott P
http://throughpolarizedeyes.com
User avatar
SkaredShtles
Posts: 2069
Joined: 5/20/2013
14ers: List not added

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by SkaredShtles » Wed Jan 13, 2021 5:57 pm

Get the red ones.
pvnisher
Posts: 1435
Joined: 9/29/2006
14ers: List not added
Trip Reports (8)

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by pvnisher » Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:42 pm

After a fall and subsequent shoulder surgery and months of rehab, release characteristics and and ease of use (ie, hard to screw up, non-fiddly) are now even more important to me than weight.
In that regard, my next set will be Shifts or whatever comes along that uses an alpine-style toe for the descent.

Also, I can't stress enough how much binding inserts have changed my life. The ability to mount one pair of bindings on multiple skis, or swap bindings on one ski pretty easily, is game changing.
I'm going out this weekend for 3 days. First day will be touring so I'm mounting my Tectons. The next two days look like powder days so I'll pull them off and mount my Wardens.
Throwing an extra set of bindings into the bag doesn't take much space, and it takes about 30 minutes to swap and adjust the bindings.

Plus whenever I buy a new set of skis I don't have to buy new bindings. Boom.
#winning
User avatar
Bean
Posts: 2699
Joined: 11/3/2005
14ers:summits37 ski37 winter10 
13ers:summits7 ski3 
Trip Reports (28)
Contact:

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by Bean » Wed Jan 13, 2021 9:18 pm

pvnisher wrote:
Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:42 pm
After a fall and subsequent shoulder surgery and months of rehab, release characteristics and and ease of use (ie, hard to screw up, non-fiddly) are now even more important to me than weight.
In that regard, my next set will be Shifts or whatever comes along that uses an alpine-style toe for the descent.
It’s critical to know how your bindings can fail to retain, usually ice and snow in the wrong places, and how to manage the issues.

I’ve got a set of like-new shifts I can sell if you’re in the market.
"There are no hard 14ers, but some are easier than others." - Scott P
http://throughpolarizedeyes.com
User avatar
Jorts
Posts: 377
Joined: 4/12/2013
14ers:summits21 ski3 winter1 
13ers:summits59 ski12 winter5 
Trip Reports (6)

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by Jorts » Wed Jan 13, 2021 9:41 pm

DaneFisher wrote:
Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:06 pm
(thinking Holy Cross Couloir type terrain)
I'm the same size as you and skied the cross two Aprils ago on ATKs mounted on Denalis (99 underfoot). As long as you're a decent skier you don't have to worry about them releasing on you. Lock the toe piece... unless you're concerned about a slide. I had fairly good conditions in there.

On long objectives like that, I trend light.
Traveling light is the only way to fly.
IG: @summityinzer
Strava: Brent Herring
User avatar
SchralpTheGnar
Posts: 1629
Joined: 2/26/2008
14ers:summits51 ski49 winter1 
13ers:summits28 ski21 
Trip Reports (20)

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by SchralpTheGnar » Wed Jan 13, 2021 9:52 pm

Do you have skis/boots/skins and just looking for bindings? If not I’d just buy some used setup (skis/skins/bindings) but get the best boots you can buy. If you don’t like, resell and try another. In my opinion confidence in your gear is the most important characteristic for skiing high consequence terrain. I also spent my first spring ski season in 1998 carrying my alpine boots in my backpack so anything after that was gonna seem lightweight anyways. Ha ha ha ahhhhh ha
pvnisher
Posts: 1435
Joined: 9/29/2006
14ers: List not added
Trip Reports (8)

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by pvnisher » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:23 am

For skins (if that's included in topic), I went with cheap, super grippy ones. Almost no glide and take up a lot of space in my pack or pockets.
I would have spent a little more and gotten glidier ones that fold smaller, especially to fit into my jacket pockets.
User avatar
Gandalf69
Posts: 142
Joined: 5/14/2020
14ers:summits31 
Trip Reports (3)

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by Gandalf69 » Thu Jan 14, 2021 6:20 am

As a snowboarder, i say that right bindings make a huge difference, but it doesn't matter what they are, as long as they function properly. I've been snowboarding before work each day in breck, I hike up the uphill path before the lifts open. My favourite ones are burton bindings because they are easy. I'm waiting to do Quandary, if we get enough snow.... if it weren't for man made snow, we might be closed down. This is definitely a snow drought year so far
"There's always the possibility that some a**hole will be offended." -Clint Eastwood, Escape from Alcatraz
"Life is cruel, why should the afterlife be any different".-Davey Jones
"The decision to triage us to death...I understand. I don't know that I would agree with it. Certainly not in retrospect because obviously I made it."-Beck Weathers, Dark side of Everest
User avatar
Snow_Dog_frassati
Posts: 88
Joined: 3/29/2020
14ers:summits56 ski1 winter5 
13ers:summits58 winter5 
Contact:

Re: Bindings! What's the word?

Post by Snow_Dog_frassati » Thu Jan 14, 2021 8:00 am

pvnisher wrote:
Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:42 pm
After a fall and subsequent shoulder surgery and months of rehab, release characteristics and and ease of use (ie, hard to screw up, non-fiddly) are now even more important to me than weight.
In that regard, my next set will be Shifts or whatever comes along that uses an alpine-style toe for the descent.
Little bit off topic but I'd probably pause on the shifts and maybe look at the marker dukes or even kingpins tbh. I got mine for the same reason and while they do ski really well (better than my alpine bindings) I'm done with them for touring. Its been a nightmare getting them to lock into uphill mode, the breaks pop down randomly, they do ice up and makes transitions hard and I know three others who have had the same or different issues. Basically I think they have definite drawbacks that are covered up by good advertising. I think they are a really interesting idea but not good if you're spending any significant amount of time touring. My instructor during my AIARE course said he's seen issues with a pair almost every class🤷🏼‍♂️
"A good decision yesterday doesn't absolve me from a bad decision today"
Post Reply