Peak(s):  Mt. Columbia  -  14,073 feet
Date Posted:  11/11/2019
Modified:  12/19/2020
Date Climbed:   11/09/2019
Author:  daway8
 Columbia Southeast Ridge pre-winter analysis  

This Southeast Ridge route seems to be the preferable winter route for Columbia since you can typically get closer to the trailhead (or perhaps all the way there) in winter than to the standard summer route trailhead, plus this is a ridgeline approach so you don’t really have much avalanche concern as opposed to some questionable looking terrain on the summer route.

In summer this route would be a no-brainer to follow (it’s a ridge…) but in winter there are a few things it may be good to have a heads up on. So this report will cover:

  • Repeat of trailhead status info reporting the error in trailhead location currently shown on this site.
  • Analysis of this route focusing on areas that might be of concern in the middle of winter.
  • Advantages/disadvantages dropping below the ridgeline in certain spots.
  • A photo or two looking over the traverse to Harvard.
  • Satellite imagery showing possible avalanche risk along potential shortcut.
  • My times


19956_35
Pano looking back on much of the ridgeline sweeping out to the right and around.

Trailhead: Location Correction and Notes

Unless someone has since updated it, the trailhead marker on 14ers.com for the Harvard Lakes trailhead is WRONG! If you use the Google Map link on the trailhead page it will take you to a spot about 3/4 of a mile short of the actual trailhead and you’ll get out and look around in the dark wondering what’s up until you pop open your Gaia GPS app and see that you’re not there yet.

19956_01
Posted vs. actual trailhead location for Harvard Lakes Trailhead.

An easy reference point is that this trail starts out along the Colorado Trail which shows up on a lot of maps, including Google Maps. As the snapshot shows, the spot identified on 14ers.com stops short of where the Colorado Trail can be seen going up the ridge. Note that this road is a bit narrow in spots and the snowier it gets the uglier it would be if you had to pass someone. Per summitpost “Plowing stops at the National Forest Boundary… expect to add up to 2.4 miles RT to this approach in winter.”

Once you get to the correct spot you’ll note that there’s not really a parking lot here – just a pullout which makes a half circle around a tree – only big enough for a few vehicles. If needed, the Silver Creek trailhead for Yale is just slightly beyond.

19956_02
Harvard Lakes Trailhead pulloff.
19956_03
Looking from pulloff to trailhead (just past rocks on the right).
19956_04
Trailhead signs.
19956_05
2nd set


Pre-winter analysis – Colorado Trail

As stated, this trail starts off along the Colorado Trail. As such, I expect this may continue to see traffic throughout the year (there was evidence of plenty of people having been over it this weekend). If that theory holds true through the winter then following the first part of the trail won’t be an issue. But even if not, I suspect it wouldn’t be hard to follow this route even if you had to break trail through heavy snow since it’s basically just a “Z” on the side of the ridge with plenty of underbrush surrounding it followed by a relatively obvious gap through the trees.

19956_06
Coming up to the first switchback.
19956_07
At the turn of the first switchback - note lots of underbrush would hinder any winter shortcuts.

When I initially glanced at this location on the map with the slope angles overlay turned on I wondered if there might possibly be avalanche concern right at the start of this trail since the slope angle does show some shading in the danger zone. But after looking at the surrounding tree cover and the thick underbrush all around the trail I decided the danger level here is probably negligible.

The primary “route finding” challenge, if you can even call it that, is deciding when to leave the Colorado Trail and start up the ridge (from there on out your only route options will be left, right or on top of the ridge). The Route Description suggests following the Colorado Trail to about 10k where it veers north, away from the ridge.

19956_08
This is where I left the Colorado Trail at around 10k - should have stuck with ridge starting at 9,900ft.


I would suggest it makes more sense to leave the Colorado Trail as soon as it begins to drift off to the right side of the ridge – which happens around 9,900ft. This way, as soon as you get up on the ridge you just stay there for the rest of the day.

19956_44
Coming back down onto Colorado Trail at the end of the day.
19956_45
Looking back up - right past this cut tree is the most logical place to leave the Colorado Trail since that trail starts to dip to the right.
19956_48
Waypoints show trailhead then where it makes most sense to leave the Colorado Trail followed by alternate point to leave it.


Pre-winter analysis – the lower ridgeline

At this point you might think ‘if I just follow the ridgeline the rest of the way then what is there left to say?’ In summertime there’s probably not much more that needs to be said. But I’ll highlight in this section some things which might be good to know if you’re going to tackle this route in the middle of winter.

Note that I’ve not yet done this route in the middle of winter (thus the title of this trip report) but since it’s on my list of possible peaks to do in calendar winter I’m writing this report as much for the sake of a future reference for myself as for the potential use it may have to others.

The first thing to note is that this route gets steep quick. A time or two I briefly considered putting on my snowshoes just so I could flip up the ascents but there wasn’t nearly enough snow for that to make sense (I’ve been carrying them just to stay used to having the extra weight, since I know I’ll want them later on in the winter – but I did manage to still drop my pack weight by 5lbs as compared to the last hike without sacrificing warmth or preparedness).

19956_09
Some sections on the ridge were clear with an obvious trail.
19956_10
Others were like being inside a game of pick up sticks.


I followed tracks through the snow where I saw them but soon wondered if the person who made them had a few too many margaritas before their hike… really never saw much of a reason to not just stay on the high point of the ridge the whole way except for a few humps here and there which you might save some effort by cutting around them.

The first significant obstacle came at about 11,400ft (roughly 1.67 miles into the hike). There is a significant rock pile right on the ridge. When dry it’s a simple little class 3 scramble to get up over it. If covered with snow/ice this could be a little dicey but most likely still easily doable if you proceed with caution. The alternative would be to make a wide sweep around on the right side through the trees but it looked like it might need to be fairly wide if you wanted to avoid all the rock pile (probably not worth it).

There is a distinctive pair of rocks on top of this mound and then it drops down slightly into a flat snowfield on the far side.

19956_11
First main rock obstacle on ridge.
19956_12
Distinctive pair of rocks at the top.

After this, the next obstacle comes at about 11,600ft (roughly 1.85 miles into the hike) where you encounter a pair of humps on the ridge. I bypassed the first on the left and then went straight over the second. Again, depending on snow cover, this region will be either more or less difficult but shouldn’t be too hard - just take care if the snow is deep to not plunge down between rocks.

Once again it flattens out slightly on the far side of the hump and after this you get to the dead tree hill.

19956_13
Cross the next set of rock obstacles.
19956_14
Far side of the rock obstacles. Dead tree hill in the distance.
19956_15
Dead tree hill.
19956_16
Looking back down dead tree hill.

Somewhere around this point is where you’re likely to start feeling some wind as up until now there has been a fair amount of tree coverage and that is mostly gone from here on.

Next up, around 12k is where you encounter another rocky hump. It’s most efficient to pass this on the left, going through the wild looking corpses of trees that were once burnt and now bleached white by the passage of time and weather.

19956_41
Looking back down on 12k hump that can be bypassed going through burn scar.
19956_42
Coming back down to the burn scar - no need to mount the hump on the left.
19956_43
Bleached out trees in the burn scar.


Pre-winter analysis – transition to the upper ridgeline – possible avy danger

At about 12,150ft (roughly 2.43 miles in) you come to the primary decision point for picking your line along the ridge. Up until now it’s just been a matter of veering a handful of feet left or right if you want to avoid a handful of feet in elevation gain. Now you’re faced with the biggest hump yet with in excess of 100 feet or more of gain to be dealt with depending on your route.

As I see it you have three primary options for the route at this point, depending on conditions.

Option A: Since the ridge was mostly dry and I was undecided about the best line I just came up to the base of some rocky outcroppings and from there tried to more or less hold altitude while sweeping around below the mini-peak above. This worked ok for a little bit but soon become annoyingly steep and rocky. I eventually veered up towards the ridgeline and got there without issue but I would consider this a rather needlessly obnoxious path to tackle (plus also see concerns with option B below). Thus…

19956_17
Option A starts about mid photo crossing the rock band coming down from the right and going straight for the saddle on the far side.
19956_18
Looking down to option B - shelf with snow on it.


Option B: While traversing option A, I noticed or more or less flat shelf just down to the left of where I was going up. On my descent I took that shelf back and found it much easier going. The trade-off for the flat easy path around the mini-peak is that you have a steeper stint to regain the ridge at the far side of the shelf but it’s no worse than what’s already been covered on this route.

19956_39
On the descent using option B.
19956_40
Looking back along the lower option B taken on the descent.


However, the real kicker for both option A and B is that the slope angle for this region is in the red zone for potential avalanche activity. There is also some evidence from satellite images that this section of the ridgeline might occasionally see some small slides. So you’ll want to carefully evaluate conditions before taking options A or B. When in doubt there’s always option C.

19956_47
Center of view is the crossover transition to the upper ridgeline. Note danger zone slope angles.
19956_46
Closer view of section in question - note evidence of "scars" in the treelines at various places under these slopes.


Option C: If there’s heavy and potentially unstable snowpack on the side of this ridge, or if you’re just not sure and want to play it safe, you can always just stay on the top of the ridgeline. By doing so you should be completely safe but you’ll end up gaining and then forfeiting somewhere around 150 feet of elevation gain – not bad at all for avoiding a nasty ride down the slopes on an avalanche but if conditions are appropriate I think I’d just as soon take option B and avoid needless gain and loss (since this route has plenty of that still to come…). Note there was very little wind along options A and B the day I went. If that holds true through winter and you get hammered by wind on the ridge you might try dropping down just slightly below on the south side.

19956_49
Starting from lower right up to first waypoint is the section involving options A-C (A and B shown by tracks, C would just stay on the ridge).


After you regain the ridgeline (or descend from the mini-peak if you did Option C) you’ll come to a a broad rolling region between you and the next major elevation gain. The most efficient route is to take the somewhat skinny lip that runs along the left edge of this region. However this does get you a little close to the steep slopes just off to your left. When dry it’s a total non-issue but if snow drifts obscure where the ridge ends you may want to opt for the other little lip just to right of the center which has slightly more up and down as you go across it.

At ~12,700ft (roughly 3.45mi in) there’s a large snow-bowl right in the middle of this flattish region with the lips on either side taking you past it up the next small hill.

19956_19
Looking back at the lip along the ridgline.
19956_20
Same area from a little higher up.


Pre-winter analysis – the upper ridgeline

The brief reprieve of more or less flat terrain is now over. Coming up is one of those sections steep enough to make you want to just keep your head down and push until it’s over. It’s simple, straight, smooth, easy going but it goes up and up and up. If there’s snow to break trail through, this section would be a real bear.

19956_21
Very simple but painfully steep climb to the upper ridgeline.
19956_22
Looking back over the route below - option B line roughly sketched in.

At the top of the hill you’ll immediately encounter 2 rocky humps. Trivial when dry, these again could add some challenge if icy/snowy. There’s a low point between these two humps at about 13,150ft – roughly 3.82mi into the hike).

19956_23
Nearing the top of the climb to the upper ridgeline - Yale visible to left of the rocks.
19956_24
The first two humps on the upper ridgeline.


After this it becomes a roller coaster of a ridgeline with hit and miss bypass options. The views here are equally inspiring or discouraging depending on your focus and mindset. The very useful Colorado 14ers in Winter page on summitpost refers to this route as a “long, snaking ridge.” You really see that come into play at this point.

19956_25
View of drop down past 2nd hump on upper ridgeline.
19956_26
View of much of the rest of the ridge.


This is a LONG RIDGE!!! Not difficult or technical and not much exposure unless you seek it out but it is really long – as in nearly 2 miles once you gain the upper ridgeline where it begins to sweep around in a wide arc.

19956_27
More of the ridge - the two humps in the distance are just before the true summit.

There is one spot at around 13,550ft (roughly 4.77mi into the hike) where you come to the base of a gnarly looking rock wall which at first glance looks like it might stop your progress, but it is easily bypassed on the left. A little while after that you’ll come to where the standard summer route pops up onto the ridgeline.

The last little bit up to the summit (just behind the dual humps you’ll have been staring at for a while) is pretty rocky and had some significant snow drifts between humps the day I was there. There’s some room to swing out to the right if needed based on conditions.

19956_28
The "rock wall" at 13,550ft - it looked more intimidating in person... Easy bypass on the left.
19956_29
Drawing closer to the summit.
19956_30
Coming up on two humps just before summit - approach along top or right side.
19956_31
Final bit to the top.


19956_32
Summit photo.

Here are a few photos in the reverse direction...

19956_36
Some rocky sections on the return trip.
19956_37
One more angle.
19956_38
Slope going back up to the first two humps on the upper ridgeline - there's a more gentle path up/down on the far right.


Harvard Traverse

I’ll just briefly toss this in here. I did the Harvard – Columbia traverse in summer many years ago. It’s a good chore even then – in full on winter conditions you’d better be on top of your game if you want to try to combo these peaks.

19956_33
Looking over to Harvard (far right) and nearby area.
19956_34
Traverse to Harvard - very long day if you want to traverse over there...

My Times

6:19am start from Harvard Lakes Trailhead.

6:35am reach rocks at first switchback.

6:44am opposite switchback (I was moving slow to evaluate the terrain and take pictures).

6:54am Colorado Trail veering right so I veered left up to the ridge (should have left trail sooner).

8:27am significant rock pile on ridge at 11,400ft.

8:34am topping out on rock pile.

8:50am big humps at 11,600ft.

9:00am base of dead tree hill.

9:24am top of dead tree hill.

9:38am passed through burn scar on left of hump.

9:49am reaching rolling terrain at 12,150ft – veered left around mini-peak.

10:27am reached 12,600ft saddle.

10:48am passing snow-bowl at 12,700ft.

11:00am flattish spot partway up big climb.

11:20am topped out and reached low point between first 2 humps on upper ridgeline.

12:14pm reached base of gnarly looking rock climb (bypassed on left).

12:33pm pm pass spot where standard summer route joins the ridge.

1:05pm summit!!

1:28pm descend

1:57pm below gnarly looking rock face.

2:33pm back to low point between first 2 humps on upper ridgeline.

3:57pm base of dead tree hill

4:48pm rejoined Colorado Trail.

4:51pm top switchback

4:59pm back at Jeep (jogged down much of the switchbacks)



My GPS Tracks on Google Maps (made from a .GPX file upload):




Thumbnails for uploaded photos (click to open slideshow):
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49


 Comments or Questions
CaptCO

Super detailed!
11/12/2019 12:34
I appreciate you taking the time to make this report. Still need Colombia and I might just tick on the traverse to add some winter conditioning. Plus I think Harvard is one of the few peaks I wouldn't mind doing twice. Cheers!

Alec


BillMiddlebrook

TH
11/13/2019 08:46
Yup, the marker is wrong for the Harvard Lakes TH. However, the driving directions on the trailhead page and in the mobile app are correct and indicate the trailhead is 0.1 mile before the Silver Creek TH.

I'll fix the TH coordinates so the marker gets updated.
Thanks!


CaptainSuburbia

Nice analysis!
01/01/2020 10:57
I did this route last March and really enjoyed it! The wind was the only real difficulty. Don't be tempted to take the east ridge back for a loop. I did this and spent many hours trenching the CT back to the th.



   Using your forum id/password. Not registered? Click Here


Caution: The information contained in this report may not be accurate and should not be the only resource used in preparation for your climb. Failure to have the necessary experience, physical conditioning, supplies or equipment can result in injury or death. 14ers.com and the author(s) of this report provide no warranties, either express or implied, that the information provided is accurate or reliable. By using the information provided, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless 14ers.com and the report author(s) with respect to any claims and demands against them, including any attorney fees and expenses. Please read the 14ers.com Safety and Disclaimer pages for more information.




© 2021 14ers.com®, 14ers Inc.