S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Trailhead condition requests, questions, alerts, etc.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
JChitwood
Posts: 660
Joined: 8/29/2011
14ers: 58 
13ers: 56
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by JChitwood »

Sure wish I’d done Columbia on one of my three trips to S Colony decades ago. And Jupiter on one of my trips to Chicago Basin. Hindsight is so much better.
"I'll make it." - Jimmy Chitwood
astranko
Posts: 166
Joined: 7/27/2020
14ers: 46  20 
13ers: 270 8
Trip Reports (3)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by astranko »

One thing worth considering is that the Cottonwood Creek Trailhead on the other side of the range is not a high traffic trailhead.

The land for both the Spanish Creek and Cottonwood Creek Trailheads belongs to Shumei International and go along their private road. Spanish Creek can accommodate maybe 3 cars max and Cottonwood is probably 8. They have closed the trailheads in the past and seem to have no desire to increase the size or accommodate more traffic. Shumei is a... spiritual.. organization that seems to have little tolerance for crowds and disruption.

Irrespective of what's happening with South Colony, I don't think it's wise to divert traffic over to the west side or suggest Cottonwood as the "new standard".
User avatar
rmcpherson
Posts: 134
Joined: 9/3/2018
14ers: 58  1  7 
13ers: 86 2 1
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by rmcpherson »

An obvious solution would be to grade the road for 2WD vehicles up to the current 4WD trailhead so that people can park on public land. Unlikely to happen due to increasingly dire USFS funding though. They'll build roads for resource extraction (maybe not in CO, for now) but improving recreational access does not seem to be a priority.
seannunn
Posts: 431
Joined: 3/6/2024
14ers: 54 
13ers: 3
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by seannunn »

"Park along the road rather than in the parking lot unless you can stay within 20 feet of the edge of the actual road."

I am confused about this. How wide is the road in the last 1/4 mile before the 2WD lot? Why can't we just park on the edge of the road prior to the lot? Unless there are signs specifically forbidding it, I can't imagine it would be illegal to park on the shoulder of a public road out in the "wilderness". What am I missing here?

Sean Nunn
Peculiar, MO
"Thy righteousness is like the great mountains."

--Psalm 36:6
markf
Posts: 136
Joined: 11/14/2007
14ers: 58  2  11 
13ers: 32 1 2
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by markf »

rmcpherson wrote: Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:27 am An obvious solution would be to grade the road for 2WD vehicles up to the current 4WD trailhead so that people can park on public land. Unlikely to happen due to increasingly dire USFS funding though. They'll build roads for resource extraction (maybe not in CO, for now) but improving recreational access does not seem to be a priority.
The road would have to be graded over and over again, since steep dirt roads tend to deteriorate pretty quickly when they're used by more than a minimal amount of motor vehicle traffic. I'd be just as happy to park my 2WD vehicle at the lower trailhead and hike in to a camping spot, as long as log as I knew my vehicle wouldn't be towed or broken into.
Last edited by markf on Thu Jun 26, 2025 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mark
User avatar
Monte Meals
Posts: 576
Joined: 5/16/2011
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by Monte Meals »

^" The road would have to be graded over and over again, since steep dirt roads tend to deteriorate "

Asphalt baby Asphalt.

If they can pave the road to the top of Pikes Peak or Blue Sky whith that stuff, :mrgreen:
shirely (yeah I know , don't call me Shirely) they can make the road to upper trailhead
subaru-able (at least if it is green)
User avatar
jsf80238
Posts: 132
Joined: 7/13/2014
14ers: 26 
13ers: 73
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by jsf80238 »

Would I be able to park at (37.95261, -105.66234) and approach Humboldt from the West?

I was thinking of using part of the Obstruction Peak route https://www.14ers.com/route.php?route=201507270727503.
astranko
Posts: 166
Joined: 7/27/2020
14ers: 46  20 
13ers: 270 8
Trip Reports (3)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by astranko »

jsf80238 wrote: Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:37 pm Would I be able to park at (37.95261, -105.66234) and approach Humboldt from the West?

I was thinking of using part of the Obstruction Peak route https://www.14ers.com/route.php?route=201507270727503.
That is the Spanish Creek trailhead. Down low, expect the approach to be poorly maintained, especially given the time of year. Any trail crews in the area (almost all just local volunteers on their own initiative) likely wouldn't have done anything yet.

Up high expect Choose-Your-Own off trail travel. It's unlikely there's any sort of visible, continuous trail to Bear's Playground. If you do go, report back with some trail info. It would be nice to know what the status is there.
User avatar
jsf80238
Posts: 132
Joined: 7/13/2014
14ers: 26 
13ers: 73
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by jsf80238 »

[/quote]

That is the Spanish Creek trailhead. Down low, expect the approach to be poorly maintained, especially given the time of year. Any trail crews in the area (almost all just local volunteers on their own initiative) likely wouldn't have done anything yet.

Up high expect Choose-Your-Own off trail travel. It's unlikely there's any sort of visible, continuous trail to Bear's Playground. If you do go, report back with some trail info. It would be nice to know what the status is there.
[/quote]

Thank you. This would be a September trip.
emilypilk1
Posts: 1
Joined: 7/3/2025
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by emilypilk1 »

Hey there! Because of these new rules on no overnight parking at 2WD lower lot.. is anyone able to give my husband and I a ride from westcliffe area up to the trailhead sometime tomorrow, July 4?? We just now realized that our plans are a tad ruined since we just realized we can’t park there! Planning on doing 3 day/2 night climbing expedition! Thank you!
User avatar
the_hare
Posts: 77
Joined: 2/11/2021
14ers: 36  29 
13ers: 27 3
Trip Reports (10)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by the_hare »

From the Custer County assessor, the parking lot and the ranch just north of it is owned by William J Sudmeier trust. The mailing address is listed not at this ranch address but as a Denver home address which is also owned by the trust. It looks like Sudmeier has been involved in real estate & renting in the Denver area as recently as 2024.

As it turns out, a Bill Sudmeier of Denver appears to be or have been an experienced 14er hiker according to a 2003 Aspen Times article detailing a traumatic rockfall incident. I'm not sure of the history of the lot there, but seeing as Sudmeier purchased the ranch property in 1999 his 14er hobby might have been why he was amenable to allowing the parking lot there in the first place. I haven't found any electronic communication means of getting a hold of Sudmeier outside of the physical Denver mailing address--he may have a profile on this very site tho!
Ef þik sækja kemr frost á fjalli háu,
Hræva kulði megi-t þínu holdi fara,
Ok haldisk æ lík at liðum
User avatar
JROSKA
Posts: 638
Joined: 8/19/2010
14ers: 52 
13ers: 6
Trip Reports (12)
 

Re: S. Colony 2WD TH - overnight no more?

Post by JROSKA »

astranko wrote: Thu Jun 26, 2025 8:34 am One thing worth considering is that the Cottonwood Creek Trailhead on the other side of the range is not a high traffic trailhead.

Spanish Creek can accommodate maybe 3 cars max and Cottonwood is probably 8.

Irrespective of what's happening with South Colony, I don't think it's wise to divert traffic over to the west side or suggest Cottonwood as the "new standard".
On this note, now that we are into summer, does anyone know if these developments at the lower TH on the other side are indeed causing the masses to park at the Cottonwood TH? More specifically, is that trailhead quickly filling up on weekends now. I was planning to head down there in August.
“Is there a thing of which it is said, ‘See, this is new’? It has been already in the ages before us. There is no remembrance of former things, nor will there be any remembrance of later things yet to be among those who come after.” - Ecclesiastes 1:10-11

“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion” - Proverbs 18:2

“Behold, he who forms the mountains and creates the wind - the Lord, the God of hosts, is his name” - Amos 4:13