Drone "max service ceiling"

Camera equipment and technique for taking photos.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
mikefromcraig
Posts: 454
Joined: 11/10/2010
14ers: 53  24 
13ers: 57
Trip Reports (15)
 

Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by mikefromcraig »

I was just about to buy a dji spark to get some creative summit shots this winter but then noticed this obscure stat:

Max Service Ceiling Above Sea Level 13,123 feet (4,000 m)

This is apparently defined as the highest the drone can maintain a 100ft elevation gain per mile distance. So now I'm wondering if it can even maintain elevation at 14,200'. I understand that cold temperature can offset the effects of altitude in that colder temperature at a given altitude is more dense and therefore provides more lift than warmer temperature. And I'm assuming that the max service ceiling is probably measured using a fairly high temperature (maybe 60).

Long story short, will the dji spark be able to fly (even if very slowly) at 14,200'?

Thanks!
"I don't believe anyone who says they would prefer to die on a mountain in their 30s than in a hospital in their 90s."
User avatar
BillMiddlebrook
Site Administrator
Posts: 6778
Joined: 7/25/2004
14ers: 58  47  19 
13ers: 174 45 37
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by BillMiddlebrook »

Drone trolling, Mike? Just asking before we get rolling.
Fascism, xenophobia, racism, and ignorance are not inevitable—they are choices. And so are compassion, understanding, and justice. Educate yourself and choose better.
User avatar
mikefromcraig
Posts: 454
Joined: 11/10/2010
14ers: 53  24 
13ers: 57
Trip Reports (15)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by mikefromcraig »

BillMiddlebrook wrote:Drone trolling, Mike? Just asking before we get rolling.
LOL How could such a specific question be a troll job?
"I don't believe anyone who says they would prefer to die on a mountain in their 30s than in a hospital in their 90s."
User avatar
Eli Boardman
Posts: 781
Joined: 6/23/2016
14ers: 58  1  15 
13ers: 18 1
Trip Reports (16)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by Eli Boardman »

I don't know about the Spark, but the Mavic Pro (more expensive) has a service ceiling of 5000 meters. I've successfully flown my Mavic Pro at the summit of Elbert, reaching max altitudes of over 14,500 feet with no adverse effects.

Sorry I can't help specifically with the Spark, but if you're willing to add the extra $, I highly recommend the Mavic Pro. It's about twice the price of the Spark, but worth it IMO.

Before anyone grabs the pitchforks, it's totally legal to fly drones within 400 feet above ground level over Mount Elbert, since it's not in a federally designated Wilderness, among other reasons.

Last edited by Eli Boardman on Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LURE
Posts: 1310
Joined: 6/27/2011
14ers: 35 
13ers: 11
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by LURE »

They sure don't "fly" here on the forums.

I crack myself up.

Now we can open the gates. OR have an honest discussion about high altitude drone efficacy. Either way.
User avatar
mikefromcraig
Posts: 454
Joined: 11/10/2010
14ers: 53  24 
13ers: 57
Trip Reports (15)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by mikefromcraig »

Eli Boardman wrote:I don't know about the Spark, but the Mavic Pro (more expensive) has a service ceiling of 5000 meters. I've successfully flown my Mavic Pro at the summit of Elbert, reaching max altitudes of over 14,500 feet with no adverse effects.

Sorry I can't help specifically with the Spark, but if you're willing to add the extra $, I highly recommend the Mavic Pro. It's about twice the price of the Spark, but worth it IMO.

Wow, you really can't tell a difference in climbing ability at 14,500'?
"I don't believe anyone who says they would prefer to die on a mountain in their 30s than in a hospital in their 90s."
User avatar
kaiman
Posts: 1365
Joined: 5/3/2006
Trip Reports (10)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by kaiman »

mikefromcraig wrote:I was just about to buy a dji spark to get some creative summit shots this winter but then noticed this obscure stat:

Max Service Ceiling Above Sea Level 13,123 feet (4,000 m)

This is apparently defined as the highest the drone can maintain a 100ft elevation gain per mile distance. So now I'm wondering if it can even maintain elevation at 14,200'. I understand that cold temperature can offset the effects of altitude in that colder temperature at a given altitude is more dense and therefore provides more lift than warmer temperature. And I'm assuming that the max service ceiling is probably measured using a fairly high temperature (maybe 60).

Long story short, will the dji spark be able to fly (even if very slowly) at 14,200'?

Thanks!
It may be an elevation limit on that specific model due to it’s design. As drones have been used in the Karakoram and Himalaya for recon and rescues at 27,000-28,000 feet, other models obviously don’t have those altitude limits.
"I want to keep the mountains clean of racism, religion and politics. In the mountains this should play no role."

- Joe Stettner

"I haven't climbed Everest, skied to the poles, or sailed single-handed around the world. The goals I set out to accomplish aren't easily measured or quantified by world records or "firsts." The reasons I climb, and the climbs I do, are about more than distance or altitude, they are about breaking barriers within myself."

- Andy Kirkpatrick
User avatar
Eli Boardman
Posts: 781
Joined: 6/23/2016
14ers: 58  1  15 
13ers: 18 1
Trip Reports (16)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by Eli Boardman »

mikefromcraig wrote:Wow, you really can't tell a difference in climbing ability at 14,500'?
Not functionally. Maybe if I cross-referenced motor RPMs and vertical speed it would be noticeable. I think the main problem becomes stability--the drone always needs to be flying at significantly less than 100% power in order to save some extra power for directional and attitude adjustments (both autonomous and user-input). On Elbert, it was nearly calm, so it seemed to fly about the same as at 7,000 feet. The battery probably drained faster, but again, I wasn't trying any scientific measurements on performance, so all I can say is it worked as intended and I got the video I wanted.
User avatar
nsaladin
Posts: 763
Joined: 11/20/2013
14ers: 58  1  5 
13ers: 12 1
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by nsaladin »

I'd like to hear from these guys which drone was used for this:

User avatar
12ersRule
Posts: 2314
Joined: 6/18/2007
14ers: 58 
13ers: 160
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by 12ersRule »

drolling - drone trolling.

It was sad that in the first few seasons of the Flintstones - Fred used to say 'Droll, very droll' all the time, and then he just stopped saying it.
Sh!tposting on the dot com since 2007!

List of peaks
Strava
User avatar
justiner
Posts: 4937
Joined: 8/28/2010
14ers: 3  1 
Trip Reports (40)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by justiner »

Long May You Range! Purveyors of fine bespoke adventures
User avatar
mikefromcraig
Posts: 454
Joined: 11/10/2010
14ers: 53  24 
13ers: 57
Trip Reports (15)
 

Re: Drone "max service ceiling"

Post by mikefromcraig »

haha when I clicked on the link, eager to learn what the "rolling technique" was, it started with an advertisement so technically I was NOT Rick Rolled!
"I don't believe anyone who says they would prefer to die on a mountain in their 30s than in a hospital in their 90s."