bergsteigen wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 1:10 pm
oldmanforest wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 1:04 pmBlah blah blah chaos
Dude. These people can still do whatever they wish with their lists. Just letting them know that they will be called out (or at minimum asked) if they didn’t do something they claimed to do. It’s called integrity. I know the younger gen doesn’t seem to get it.
Long time lurker here who went looking for Square Top conditions and saw the debate. Signed up to comment on this, forgive the young account.
There's dissonance in your words, you say they can do what they like with their lists (keeping them public included) but it's clear you're trying to rally the community to stand against them doing exactly that. What's lacking in integrity is to ask for people's opinions but then supplant "blahs" when they express an opinion you don't like. If you were genuinely looking for community input you would have a discourse.
Further, to those saying to aspiring finishers, "you don't want to go back and ski those peaks"... please speak for yourself. Perhaps some finish exclusively to get the icon/fame points. However, I know at least one person (me) who would like to finish one day, for exploration's sake, but also enjoys skiing for skiing's sake, be it icy sastrugi or endless powder and so would would not turn down an opportunity to re-ski a peak that's not a 'good one'.
I think you should judge people's accomplishments within the context of their claims. Nowhere does it say the little skier icon == adheres to Dawson's rules, so sure, it's not complete per a Dawson descent, but if they never claimed to adhere to Dawson's rules then why get up in arms just because you follow them? Besides, semantically, those rules are explicitly 14er specific, but the icon is universal to 12ers and 13ers, and this debate was spawned over a 13er. Do the rules change between Grizzly and Holy Cross?