LoJ unranked 13ers not on 14ers.com
Forum rules
- This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
- Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
- Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
- Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Re: LoJ unranked 13ers not on 14ers.com
On a similar note and could be germane to this thread, wasn't the "total" 788 before, any ideas what was taken off to make it 787 on here now?
-
Boggy B
- Posts: 968
- Joined: 10/14/2009
- 14ers: 58 7
- 13ers: 784 76
- Trip Reports (57)
Re: LoJ unranked 13ers not on 14ers.com
As the saying goes, "one Exercise in Tedious Obscurities keeps another in the sheath"
Re: LoJ unranked 13ers not on 14ers.com
When Bill demoted Columbia Point to unranked on here it dropped the ranked to 582 and unranked to 787, if you go look at Garrett, Heather or Alex's checklist it says 788/787 (it has 299.6 ft of prominence according to the measurement https://www.countryhighpoints.com/colum ... nt-survey/ here)ericahlstedt wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2026 10:39 am On a similar note and could be germane to this thread, wasn't the "total" 788 before, any ideas what was taken off to make it 787 on here now?
Also this thread as been a joy to read, maybe one of the more productive discussions (ever?) in the dot com forums. Thanks to everyone who cares so deeply about the unranked 13ers to contribute. I've been doing them the whole time I've been climbing peaks in Colorado and there certainly are some that feel like a peak and some that feel like a joke. It's interesting to try to define something so vague, but it's fun to have more peaks. Will have to check out some of those GPS coordinates for over 240' prominence posted above as well. Thank you all for sharing.